NOCT vs. DBMF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NOCT (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NOCT is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, NOCT returned 10.46%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for DBMF. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.

Performance

NOCT vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOCT achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 12.42% return.

NOCT

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.54%
• YTD: 7.61%
• 6M: 7.69%
• 1Y: 17.36%
• 3Y*: 14.98%
• 5Y*: 10.46%
• 10Y*: —

DBMF

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 2.35%
• YTD: 12.42%
• 6M: 14.20%
• 1Y: 31.40%
• 3Y*: 10.81%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOCT vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
NOCT Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October	7.61%	12.81%	12.10%	30.67%	-13.42%	12.10%	11.64%	5.54%
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	12.42%	13.85%	7.24%	-8.94%	21.61%	11.49%	1.80%	-0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between NOCT and DBMF is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019	0.11

The correlation between NOCT and DBMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (5 years) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NOCT vs. DBMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NOCT	DBMF
Technology	54.2%	29.8%
Communication Services	15.5%	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	11.0%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	6.1%
Healthcare	4.2%	12.7%
Industrials	2.8%	8.4%
Utilities	1.4%	2.3%
Basic Materials	1.2%	2.2%
Energy	0.6%	3.9%
Financial Services	0.2%	12.5%
Real Estate	0.1%	2.5%

Return for Risk

NOCT vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOCT

NOCT Risk / Return Rank: 71
NOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
NOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
NOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 78
NOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
NOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 74

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 83
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOCT vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NOCT	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	2.59	-0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.26	3.39	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.55	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.99	5.17	-2.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.90	19.07	-5.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NOCT vs. DBMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOCT and DBMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NOCT	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	2.59	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96	0.68	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.01	0.77	+0.23

Drawdowns

NOCT vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOCT drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, smaller than the maximum DBMF drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOCT and DBMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOCT	DBMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.21%	-20.39%	+4.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.84%	-6.10%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.70%	-15.60%	+2.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.21%	-20.39%	+4.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	0.00%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.34%	-6.59%	+4.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.25%	1.65%	-0.40%

Volatility

NOCT vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) is 1.01%, while iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) has a volatility of 2.12%. This indicates that NOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOCT	DBMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.01%	2.12%	-1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.90%	9.76%	-3.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.55%	12.17%	-4.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.93%	12.52%	-1.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.19%	12.41%	-1.22%

NOCT vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

NOCT vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

NOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.09%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%
NOCT Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOCT and DBMF in my portfolio?

NOCT and DBMF have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NOCT or DBMF?

DBMF has higher volatility (2.12%) compared to NOCT (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOCT dropped -16.21% vs DBMF's -20.39%.

Which ETF is better, NOCT or DBMF?

On 5-year performance, NOCT leads with 10.46% vs 8.46% for DBMF. On fees, NOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, NOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NOCT or DBMF?

Over the 5-year period, NOCT has performed better with a 10.46% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NOCT or DBMF?

NOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NOCT or DBMF?

DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 0.00% for NOCT.

What is the main difference between NOCT and DBMF?

NOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NOCT and 0.85% for DBMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.