NNOV vs. OCTB
NNOV (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November) and OCTB (Aptus October Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NNOV charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OCTB.
Performance
NNOV vs. OCTB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NNOV achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than OCTB's 5.52% return.
NNOV
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 7.35%
- 1Y
- 15.31%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OCTB
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 6M
- 5.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NNOV vs. OCTB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NNOV Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November | 8.17% | 0.47% |
OCTB Aptus October Buffer ETF | 5.52% | 2.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between NNOV and OCTB is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NNOV vs. OCTB — Risk / Return Rank
NNOV
OCTB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NNOV vs. OCTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November (NNOV) and Aptus October Buffer ETF (OCTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NNOV | OCTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.97 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NNOV vs. OCTB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NNOV drawdown since its inception was -12.80%, which is greater than OCTB's maximum drawdown of -4.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNOV and OCTB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NNOV | OCTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.80% | -4.79% | -8.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -0.82% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.40% | -0.69% | -0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.54% | — | — |
Volatility
NNOV vs. OCTB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NNOV | OCTB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.04% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.26% | 7.26% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.60% | 7.26% | +4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.60% | 7.26% | +4.34% |
NNOV vs. OCTB - Expense Ratio Comparison
NNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than OCTB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
NNOV vs. OCTB - Dividend Comparison
Neither NNOV nor OCTB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, NNOV and OCTB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, OCTB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OCTB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NNOV.
NNOV and OCTB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NNOV and 0.25% for OCTB.
Find the right allocation for NNOV and OCTB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer