NNOV vs. LOUP

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

NNOV (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NNOV is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. NNOV is actively managed, while LOUP is passively managed. Over the past year, NNOV returned 12.52% vs 37.12% for LOUP. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NNOV charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.

Performance

NNOV vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November (NNOV) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NNOV achieves a 8.05% return, which is significantly lower than LOUP's 11.39% return.

NNOV

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -0.41%
• 6M: 7.21%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 1Y: 12.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.92%

LOUP

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: -11.40%
• 6M: 9.89%
• YTD: 11.39%
• 1Y: 37.12%
• 3Y*: 27.47%
• 5Y*: 10.70%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 16.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF	$926.73K	$920.97K	$1.38M
NNOV Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November	$114.26K	$114.70K	$530.24K

NNOV vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NNOV Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November	8.05%	11.20%	2.87%
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF	11.39%	43.24%	7.75%

Correlation

The correlation between NNOV and LOUP is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2024	0.80

The correlation between NNOV and LOUP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NNOV vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NNOV

NNOV Risk / Return Rank: 55
NNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
NNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
NNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
NNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
NNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 60

LOUP

LOUP Risk / Return Rank: 42
LOUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
LOUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
LOUP Omega Ratio Rank: 38
LOUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
LOUP Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NNOV vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November (NNOV) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NNOV	LOUP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	1.05	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	1.54	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.18	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	1.55	+0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.28	4.59	+2.69

NNOV vs. LOUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NNOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the LOUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NNOV and LOUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NNOV vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NNOV drawdown since its inception was -12.80%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNOV and LOUP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NNOV	LOUP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.80%	-58.68%	+45.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.70%	-21.00%	+14.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.23%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	-14.75%	+13.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.38%	-19.79%	+18.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	7.09%	-5.49%

Volatility

NNOV vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November (NNOV) is 3.15%, while Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a volatility of 9.47%. This indicates that NNOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NNOV	LOUP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.15%	9.47%	-6.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.38%	25.04%	-17.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.79%	31.22%	-22.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.51%	32.84%	-21.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.51%	32.07%	-20.56%

NNOV vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

NNOV vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison

Neither NNOV nor LOUP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NNOV and LOUP in my portfolio?

NNOV and LOUP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NNOV or LOUP?

LOUP has higher volatility (9.47%) compared to NNOV (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NNOV dropped -12.80% vs LOUP's -58.68%.

Which ETF is better, NNOV or LOUP?

On 1-year performance, LOUP leads with 37.12% vs 12.52% for NNOV. On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, NNOV has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NNOV or LOUP?

Over the 1-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 37.12% return vs 12.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NNOV or LOUP?

LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NNOV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NNOV or LOUP?

NNOV and LOUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NNOV and LOUP?

NNOV is categorized as Defined Outcome, while LOUP is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NNOV and 0.70% for LOUP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.