NNOV vs. BPH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NNOV (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NNOV is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while BPH is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Precidian. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. NNOV charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

NNOV vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November (NNOV) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NNOV

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: -0.24%
• YTD: 8.17%
• 6M: 7.35%
• 1Y: 15.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NNOV vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NNOV Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November	-0.24%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-5.53%

Correlation

The correlation between NNOV and BPH is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	-0.08

Return for Risk

NNOV vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NNOV

NNOV Risk / Return Rank: 62
NNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
NNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
NNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 70
NNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
NNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 61

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NNOV vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November (NNOV) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NNOV	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.97	—	—

Drawdowns

NNOV vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NNOV drawdown since its inception was -12.80%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNOV and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	NNOV	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.80%	-9.43%	-3.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-8.71%	+7.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.40%	-3.18%	+1.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.54%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NNOV	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.04%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.26%	24.10%	-15.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.60%	24.10%	-12.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.60%	24.10%	-12.50%

NNOV vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NNOV has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

NNOV vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

NNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.

Position	TTM
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.53%
NNOV Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - November	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NNOV and BPH in my portfolio?

NNOV and BPH have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NNOV or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NNOV or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NNOV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NNOV or BPH?

BPH has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for NNOV.

What is the main difference between NNOV and BPH?

NNOV is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BPH is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NNOV and 0.19% for BPH.