PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMUIX vs. MUJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMUIX vs. MUJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund (NMUIX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMUIX achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than MUJ's 5.16% return. Over the past 10 years, NMUIX has underperformed MUJ with an annualized return of 1.78%, while MUJ has yielded a comparatively higher 2.52% annualized return.


NMUIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.75%
1Y
6.00%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
0.72%
10Y*
1.78%

MUJ

1D
0.25%
1M
1.02%
YTD
5.16%
6M
5.36%
1Y
18.79%
3Y*
8.70%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*
2.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMUIX vs. MUJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMUIX
Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund
1.42%5.31%2.19%5.14%-9.87%1.46%3.82%6.76%0.94%3.93%
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
5.16%13.86%2.28%7.55%-26.31%15.20%5.95%18.95%-8.49%9.99%

Correlation

The correlation between NMUIX and MUJ is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 1998

0.27

The correlation between NMUIX and MUJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMUIX vs. MUJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMUIX
NMUIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NMUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
NMUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

MUJ
MUJ Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
MUJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MUJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMUIX vs. MUJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund (NMUIX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMUIXMUJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.73

2.14

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.30

3.11

+1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.43

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

1.96

+0.60

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.86

7.97

+0.89

NMUIX vs. MUJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMUIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the MUJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMUIX and MUJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMUIXMUJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.14

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

-0.00

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.23

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.35

+0.89

Drawdowns

NMUIX vs. MUJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMUIX drawdown since its inception was -13.85%, smaller than the maximum MUJ drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMUIX and MUJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMUIXMUJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.85%

-41.72%

+27.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.40%

-9.41%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.44%

-12.17%

+7.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.85%

-32.71%

+18.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.85%

-32.71%

+18.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-2.98%

+2.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.62%

-9.04%

+7.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

2.32%

-1.63%

Volatility

NMUIX vs. MUJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund (NMUIX) is 0.86%, while BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) has a volatility of 2.84%. This indicates that NMUIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMUIXMUJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

2.84%

-1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.77%

6.89%

-5.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18%

8.81%

-6.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.19%

10.35%

-7.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.43%

11.20%

-7.77%

NMUIX vs. MUJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMUIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MUJ's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMUIX vs. MUJ - Dividend Comparison

NMUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%, less than MUJ's 5.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
5.29%5.45%5.53%4.13%6.40%4.77%4.78%4.03%5.34%5.55%6.00%5.69%
NMUIX
Neuberger Berman Municipal Intermediate Bond Fund
2.88%3.75%3.17%2.03%1.58%2.37%2.32%2.80%2.38%2.31%2.65%2.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMUIX and MUJ have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUJ has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to NMUIX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMUIX dropped -13.85% vs MUJ's -41.72%.

NMUIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMUIX and MUJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer