PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUJ vs. MPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUJ vs. MPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) and BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUJ achieves a 3.83% return, which is significantly higher than MPA's 1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, MUJ has outperformed MPA with an annualized return of 2.09%, while MPA has yielded a comparatively lower 0.98% annualized return.


MUJ

1D
0.08%
1M
-2.57%
6M
0.09%
YTD
3.83%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
-0.26%
10Y*
2.09%
ALL TIME*
4.41%

MPA

1D
0.46%
1M
-3.46%
6M
-1.41%
YTD
1.78%
1Y
7.65%
3Y*
4.37%
5Y*
-3.29%
10Y*
0.98%
ALL TIME*
4.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$352.50K$256.70K$315.59K
$969.39K$870.71K$1.11M

MUJ vs. MPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
3.83%13.86%2.28%7.55%-26.31%15.20%5.95%18.95%-8.49%9.99%
MPA
BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund
1.78%1.82%6.23%9.67%-31.00%17.06%9.14%18.87%-8.00%7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MUJ and MPA is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 1998

0.35

The correlation between MUJ and MPA shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.55 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUJ vs. MPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MUJ
MUJ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MUJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
MUJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

MPA
MPA Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPA Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
MPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPA Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MUJ vs. MPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) and BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUJMPADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.17

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

1.20

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.89

4.45

+2.44

MUJ vs. MPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the MPA Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUJ and MPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MUJ vs. MPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUJ drawdown since its inception was -41.72%, smaller than the maximum MPA drawdown of -44.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUJ and MPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUJMPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.72%

-44.78%

+3.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-6.42%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.04%

-14.75%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.71%

-38.10%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.71%

-38.10%

+5.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.21%

-19.00%

+14.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-9.80%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

1.72%

+0.61%

Volatility

MUJ vs. MPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) is 1.60%, while BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA) has a volatility of 2.04%. This indicates that MUJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUJMPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

2.04%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

6.11%

+0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.76%

8.10%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.33%

12.07%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.12%

12.31%

-1.19%

MUJ vs. MPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUJ has a 2.26% expense ratio, which is lower than MPA's 2.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUJ vs. MPA - Dividend Comparison

MUJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, less than MPA's 5.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPA
BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund
5.90%6.98%6.02%3.63%5.60%3.94%4.12%4.16%5.40%5.22%5.56%5.94%
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
5.41%5.45%5.53%4.13%6.40%4.77%4.78%4.03%5.34%5.55%6.00%5.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUJ and MPA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MPA has higher volatility (2.04%) compared to MUJ (1.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUJ dropped -41.72% vs MPA's -44.78%.

MUJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUJ and MPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer