PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMTRX vs. ECAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NMTRX vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NMTRX vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
-0.12%3.90%1.99%6.21%-11.98%1.33%
ECAT
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
-4.58%16.64%19.96%32.36%-21.90%-6.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMTRX achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly higher than ECAT's -4.58% return.


NMTRX

1D
0.20%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
-0.12%
6M
1.65%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
3.22%
5Y*
0.38%
10Y*
2.27%

ECAT

1D
2.28%
1M
-6.35%
YTD
-4.58%
6M
-6.60%
1Y
8.30%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NMTRX vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMTRX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ECAT's 1.38% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NMTRX vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMTRX
NMTRX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NMTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
NMTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

ECAT
ECAT Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ECAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECAT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ECAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMTRX vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMTRXECATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

0.49

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.16

0.78

+0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.11

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

0.73

+0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.89

2.69

+0.20

NMTRX vs. ECAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMTRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the ECAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMTRX and ECAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMTRXECATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

0.49

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.35

+0.62

Correlation

The correlation between NMTRX and ECAT is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NMTRX vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison

NMTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than ECAT's 24.82% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
4.19%4.46%3.55%3.67%3.28%2.73%2.92%3.20%3.47%3.28%3.71%3.91%
ECAT
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
24.82%23.00%17.44%9.14%8.94%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NMTRX vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMTRX drawdown since its inception was -16.36%, smaller than the maximum ECAT drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMTRX and ECAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NMTRXECATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.36%

-32.23%

+15.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.75%

-12.90%

+8.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

-8.44%

+6.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.93%

-9.40%

+6.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

3.53%

-1.91%

Volatility

NMTRX vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) is 1.07%, while BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that NMTRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NMTRXECATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

6.50%

-5.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.82%

10.60%

-8.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.93%

17.10%

-12.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.97%

16.98%

-13.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.38%

16.98%

-12.60%