PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMTRX vs. DFABX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMTRX vs. DFABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) and DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMTRX achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly higher than DFABX's 1.18% return.


NMTRX

1D
0.10%
1M
2.01%
YTD
2.68%
6M
3.08%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
0.52%
10Y*
2.29%

DFABX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.18%
1Y
2.66%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMTRX vs. DFABX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
2.68%3.90%1.99%6.21%-3.16%
DFABX
DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio
1.18%2.46%2.90%2.87%0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between NMTRX and DFABX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2022

0.40

The correlation between NMTRX and DFABX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMTRX vs. DFABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMTRX
NMTRX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
NMTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
NMTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

DFABX
DFABX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
DFABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFABX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
DFABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFABX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMTRX vs. DFABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) and DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NMTRXDFABXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

6.47

-4.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

24.96

-21.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

107.63

-96.08

NMTRX vs. DFABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMTRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is lower than the DFABX Sharpe Ratio of 4.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMTRX and DFABX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NMTRX vs. DFABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMTRX drawdown since its inception was -16.36%, which is greater than DFABX's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMTRX and DFABX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMTRXDFABXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.36%

-2.46%

-13.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.65%

-0.11%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.77%

-0.60%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-0.23%

-2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

0.02%

+0.70%

Volatility

NMTRX vs. DFABX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) has a higher volatility of 0.88% compared to DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio (DFABX) at 0.19%. This indicates that NMTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMTRXDFABXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

0.19%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

0.43%

+1.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97%

0.57%

+2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.02%

0.96%

+3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.40%

0.96%

+3.44%

NMTRX vs. DFABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMTRX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DFABX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NMTRX vs. DFABX - Dividend Comparison

NMTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than DFABX's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFABX
DFA Short-Term Selective State Municipal Bond Portfolio
2.62%2.33%2.86%2.52%1.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
4.57%4.46%3.55%3.67%3.28%2.73%2.92%3.20%3.47%3.28%3.71%3.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMTRX and DFABX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMTRX has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to DFABX (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMTRX dropped -16.36% vs DFABX's -2.46%.

DFABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.77 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMTRX and DFABX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer