NMS vs. NVLIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS) and Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX).
NMS is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Jun 25, 1993. NVLIX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on May 15, 2009.
Performance
NMS vs. NVLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NMS vs. NVLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMS Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund | 5.59% | 2.10% | 19.59% | 1.57% | -21.89% | 5.47% | 5.80% | 25.72% | -13.31% | -1.58% |
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | -11.60% | 12.76% | 29.48% | 43.60% | -31.31% | 27.62% | 37.97% | 33.54% | 3.02% | 33.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMS achieves a 5.59% return, which is significantly higher than NVLIX's -11.60% return. Over the past 10 years, NMS has underperformed NVLIX with an annualized return of 2.11%, while NVLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.48% annualized return.
NMS
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 5.59%
- 6M
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- 8.43%
- 3Y*
- 6.46%
- 5Y*
- 1.22%
- 10Y*
- 2.11%
NVLIX
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- -6.71%
- YTD
- -11.60%
- 6M
- -11.36%
- 1Y
- 9.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.66%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NMS vs. NVLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMS has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than NVLIX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NMS vs. NVLIX — Risk / Return Rank
NMS
NVLIX
NMS vs. NVLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS) and Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMS | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 0.47 | +0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 0.84 | +0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.12 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 0.39 | +1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.68 | 1.29 | +2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMS | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 0.47 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.43 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 | 0.71 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.74 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between NMS and NVLIX is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NMS vs. NVLIX - Dividend Comparison
NMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%, less than NVLIX's 25.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMS Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund | 6.84% | 7.29% | 6.05% | 4.03% | 5.24% | 4.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 5.52% | 5.20% | 4.68% | 5.60% |
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | 25.40% | 22.45% | 14.35% | 5.39% | 8.93% | 9.51% | 5.47% | 8.69% | 18.81% | 18.70% | 17.11% | 15.18% |
Drawdowns
NMS vs. NVLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMS drawdown since its inception was -38.76%, roughly equal to the maximum NVLIX drawdown of -39.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMS and NVLIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMS | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.76% | -39.57% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.92% | -19.01% | +14.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.76% | -39.57% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.76% | -39.57% | +0.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.24% | -16.03% | +10.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.80% | -6.20% | -4.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 5.80% | -3.39% |
Volatility
NMS vs. NVLIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS) is 2.87%, while Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that NMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NMS | NVLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 6.85% | -3.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.93% | 12.64% | -6.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.95% | 22.89% | -13.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.10% | 22.40% | -8.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 21.99% | -7.36% |