NMS vs. NIM
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS) and Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund (NIM).
NMS is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Jun 25, 1993. NIM is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Sep 18, 1992.
Performance
NMS vs. NIM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NMS vs. NIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMS Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund | 5.76% | 2.10% | 19.59% | 1.57% | -21.89% | 5.47% | 5.80% | 25.72% | -13.31% | -1.58% |
NIM Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund | 2.42% | 10.88% | 2.74% | 0.75% | -12.95% | 2.95% | 5.44% | 12.77% | -0.49% | 5.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMS achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly higher than NIM's 2.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NMS having a 2.13% annualized return and NIM not far ahead at 2.14%.
NMS
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 5.76%
- 6M
- 5.82%
- 1Y
- 9.04%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- 1.26%
- 10Y*
- 2.13%
NIM
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 6M
- 3.94%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- 2.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NMS vs. NIM - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMS has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than NIM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
NMS vs. NIM — Risk / Return Rank
NMS
NIM
NMS vs. NIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS) and Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund (NIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMS | NIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 0.51 | +0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.44 | 0.80 | +0.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.10 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 1.05 | +0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.74 | 3.21 | +0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMS | NIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 0.51 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.07 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.20 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.24 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between NMS and NIM is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NMS vs. NIM - Dividend Comparison
NMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than NIM's 3.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMS Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund | 6.83% | 7.29% | 6.05% | 4.03% | 5.24% | 4.19% | 3.93% | 4.05% | 5.52% | 5.20% | 4.68% | 5.60% |
NIM Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund | 3.60% | 3.61% | 4.10% | 3.49% | 2.88% | 2.69% | 3.42% | 3.03% | 3.27% | 3.15% | 3.23% | 3.27% |
Drawdowns
NMS vs. NIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMS drawdown since its inception was -38.76%, which is greater than NIM's maximum drawdown of -23.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMS and NIM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMS | NIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.76% | -23.09% | -15.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.07% | -6.03% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.76% | -19.96% | -18.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.76% | -19.96% | -18.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.09% | -4.21% | -0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.81% | -5.93% | -4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 1.96% | +0.45% |
Volatility
NMS vs. NIM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Minnesota Quality Municipal Income Fund (NMS) is 2.88%, while Nuveen Select Maturities Municipal Fund (NIM) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that NMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NMS | NIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.88% | 4.49% | -1.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.95% | 7.22% | -1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.95% | 10.17% | -1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.10% | 10.66% | +3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.63% | 10.78% | +3.85% |