PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMRK vs. PARR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NMRK vs. PARR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) and Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMRK achieves a -12.46% return, which is significantly lower than PARR's 101.82% return.


NMRK

1D
-0.72%
1M
-0.59%
6M
-12.81%
YTD
-12.46%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
30.76%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*

PARR

1D
7.81%
1M
27.05%
6M
92.20%
YTD
101.82%
1Y
102.28%
3Y*
38.23%
5Y*
36.11%
10Y*
16.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMRK vs. PARR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMRK
Newmark Group, Inc.
-12.46%36.47%18.06%39.87%-56.96%157.32%-44.91%74.73%-48.39%13.17%
PARR
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
101.82%114.40%-54.94%56.43%40.99%17.95%-39.85%63.89%-26.45%-5.30%

Correlation

The correlation between NMRK and PARR is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017

0.30

The correlation between NMRK and PARR shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NMRK:

$2.36B

PARR:

$3.56B

EPS

NMRK:

$0.59

PARR:

$13.39

PE Ratio

NMRK:

25.71

PARR:

5.30

PEG Ratio

NMRK:

14.02

PARR:

0.03

PS Ratio

NMRK:

1.10

PARR:

0.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

NMRK:

$3.48B

PARR:

$7.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NMRK:

$3.38B

PARR:

$1.47B

EBITDA (TTM)

NMRK:

$459.76M

PARR:

$744.08M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMRK vs. PARR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMRK
NMRK Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
NMRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMRK Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
NMRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMRK Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

PARR
PARR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PARR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PARR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PARR Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PARR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PARR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMRK vs. PARR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) and Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NMRKPARRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.29

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

3.85

-3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.31

8.08

-6.78

NMRK vs. PARR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMRK Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the PARR Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMRK and PARR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NMRK vs. PARR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMRK drawdown since its inception was -83.84%, which is greater than PARR's maximum drawdown of -78.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMRK and PARR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMRKPARRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.84%

-78.51%

-5.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.08%

-26.73%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.60%

-69.71%

+33.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.92%

-69.71%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.33%

0.00%

-22.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.57%

-30.89%

-4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.31%

12.85%

+3.46%

Volatility

NMRK vs. PARR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) is 7.05%, while Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. (PARR) has a volatility of 18.05%. This indicates that NMRK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PARR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMRKPARRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.05%

18.05%

-11.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.91%

41.29%

-11.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.29%

56.68%

-19.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.63%

50.75%

-8.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.78%

52.30%

+4.48%

Dividends

NMRK vs. PARR - Dividend Comparison

NMRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, while PARR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NMRK
Newmark Group, Inc.
0.99%0.69%0.94%1.09%1.25%0.21%1.78%2.90%3.37%
PARR
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NMRK vs. PARR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Newmark Group, Inc. and Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
847.16M
1.82B
(NMRK) Total Revenue
(PARR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NMRK vs. PARR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Newmark Group, Inc. and Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
94.5%
14.5%
Portfolio components
NMRK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Newmark Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 800.93M and revenue of 847.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 94.5%.

PARR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 265.25M and revenue of 1.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.5%.

NMRK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Newmark Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 26.96M and revenue of 847.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

PARR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 65.32M and revenue of 1.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

NMRK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Newmark Group, Inc. reported a net income of 14.42M and revenue of 847.16M, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.

PARR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 54.45M and revenue of 1.82B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NMRK and PARR have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PARR has higher volatility (18.05%) compared to NMRK (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMRK dropped -83.84% vs PARR's -78.51%.

PARR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMRK and PARR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer