NMPAX vs. FSMDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund (NMPAX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX).
NMPAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Mar 31, 2000. FSMDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 8, 2011.
Performance
NMPAX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NMPAX vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMPAX Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund | -0.42% | 7.23% | 13.67% | 16.32% | -13.27% | 24.66% | 8.71% | 25.99% | -11.44% | 15.84% |
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund | 1.30% | 10.58% | 15.55% | 17.20% | -17.27% | 22.56% | 17.13% | 30.53% | -9.38% | 18.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMPAX achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly lower than FSMDX's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, NMPAX has underperformed FSMDX with an annualized return of 9.50%, while FSMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.81% annualized return.
NMPAX
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -8.07%
- YTD
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 13.76%
- 3Y*
- 10.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
FSMDX
- 1D
- 2.63%
- 1M
- -5.55%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 13.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.99%
- 10Y*
- 10.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NMPAX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMPAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
NMPAX vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank
NMPAX
FSMDX
NMPAX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund (NMPAX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMPAX | FSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 0.84 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 1.30 | -0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.18 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 1.23 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.68 | 5.73 | -2.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMPAX | FSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 0.84 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.38 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.56 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.66 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between NMPAX and FSMDX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NMPAX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison
NMPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.38%, more than FSMDX's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMPAX Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund | 9.38% | 9.34% | 11.35% | 7.97% | 11.65% | 18.03% | 5.96% | 5.70% | 10.06% | 7.66% | 7.97% | 10.12% |
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund | 1.09% | 1.10% | 2.46% | 1.39% | 2.07% | 3.35% | 2.34% | 2.86% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.23% | 2.84% |
Drawdowns
NMPAX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMPAX drawdown since its inception was -54.31%, which is greater than FSMDX's maximum drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMPAX and FSMDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMPAX | FSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.31% | -40.35% | -13.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.10% | -13.42% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | -26.07% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.09% | -40.35% | -1.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.84% | -5.74% | -3.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -5.00% | -2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 2.89% | +0.36% |
Volatility
NMPAX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund (NMPAX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) have volatilities of 5.84% and 5.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NMPAX | FSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 5.58% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.54% | 10.50% | +1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.89% | 19.10% | +1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.67% | 18.27% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.08% | 19.30% | +1.78% |