PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMPAX vs. VEMPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMPAX vs. VEMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund (NMPAX) and Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VEMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NMPAX having a 14.02% return and VEMPX slightly lower at 13.78%. Over the past 10 years, NMPAX has underperformed VEMPX with an annualized return of 10.60%, while VEMPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.10% annualized return.


NMPAX

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.53%
YTD
14.02%
6M
13.69%
1Y
25.56%
3Y*
15.92%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
10.60%

VEMPX

1D
-1.01%
1M
3.43%
YTD
13.78%
6M
11.95%
1Y
28.76%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
12.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMPAX vs. VEMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMPAX
Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund
14.02%7.23%13.67%16.32%-13.27%24.66%8.71%25.99%-11.44%15.84%
VEMPX
Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
13.78%11.43%15.50%26.98%-26.45%12.48%32.24%28.06%-9.35%18.13%

Correlation

The correlation between NMPAX and VEMPX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2010

0.96

The correlation between NMPAX and VEMPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMPAX vs. VEMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMPAX
NMPAX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
NMPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NMPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VEMPX
VEMPX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
VEMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMPAX vs. VEMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund (NMPAX) and Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VEMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMPAXVEMPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.29

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

2.83

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.50

9.99

+0.51

NMPAX vs. VEMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the VEMPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMPAX and VEMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMPAXVEMPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.69

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.30

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.54

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.54

-0.11

Drawdowns

NMPAX vs. VEMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMPAX drawdown since its inception was -54.31%, which is greater than VEMPX's maximum drawdown of -41.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMPAX and VEMPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMPAXVEMPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.31%

-41.62%

-12.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.84%

-10.25%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.03%

-26.83%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.03%

-36.32%

+12.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.09%

-41.62%

-0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-1.01%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.72%

-7.97%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.41%

2.89%

-0.48%

Volatility

NMPAX vs. VEMPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund (NMPAX) is 4.38%, while Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VEMPX) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that NMPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEMPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMPAXVEMPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

4.83%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.35%

12.48%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.51%

17.21%

-1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.71%

22.34%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.12%

22.36%

-1.24%

NMPAX vs. VEMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMPAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VEMPX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NMPAX vs. VEMPX - Dividend Comparison

NMPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.19%, more than VEMPX's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMPAX
Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund
8.19%9.34%11.35%7.97%11.65%18.03%5.96%5.70%10.06%7.66%7.97%10.12%
VEMPX
Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
1.03%1.15%1.11%1.27%1.17%1.15%1.09%1.32%1.68%1.27%1.46%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, NMPAX and VEMPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEMPX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to NMPAX (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMPAX dropped -54.31% vs VEMPX's -41.62%.

VEMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMPAX and VEMPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer