NMIMX vs. GSFTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Fund (NMIMX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX).
NMIMX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jul 31, 1996. GSFTX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Mar 4, 1998.
Performance
NMIMX vs. GSFTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NMIMX vs. GSFTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMIMX Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Fund | -5.21% | 16.99% | 25.64% | 26.24% | -16.99% | 31.73% | 15.48% | 25.87% | -5.07% | 24.13% |
GSFTX Columbia Dividend Income Fund | 3.24% | 15.88% | 15.00% | 10.57% | -4.94% | 26.26% | 7.75% | 28.12% | -4.38% | 20.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMIMX achieves a -5.21% return, which is significantly lower than GSFTX's 3.24% return. Over the past 10 years, NMIMX has outperformed GSFTX with an annualized return of 13.63%, while GSFTX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.14% annualized return.
NMIMX
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -4.64%
- YTD
- -5.21%
- 6M
- -2.06%
- 1Y
- 16.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.01%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
GSFTX
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -3.89%
- YTD
- 3.24%
- 6M
- 5.95%
- 1Y
- 16.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NMIMX vs. GSFTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMIMX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than GSFTX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NMIMX vs. GSFTX — Risk / Return Rank
NMIMX
GSFTX
NMIMX vs. GSFTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Fund (NMIMX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMIMX | GSFTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 1.22 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.44 | 1.74 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.27 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 1.77 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.43 | 8.20 | -1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMIMX | GSFTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 1.22 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.81 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.78 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.54 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between NMIMX and GSFTX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NMIMX vs. GSFTX - Dividend Comparison
NMIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.77%, more than GSFTX's 5.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMIMX Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Fund | 13.77% | 13.05% | 13.52% | 4.87% | 9.00% | 28.11% | 7.52% | 4.15% | 12.30% | 12.94% | 1.60% | 2.30% |
GSFTX Columbia Dividend Income Fund | 5.23% | 5.35% | 6.02% | 4.96% | 3.87% | 2.87% | 1.74% | 2.90% | 7.63% | 4.00% | 3.77% | 8.27% |
Drawdowns
NMIMX vs. GSFTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMIMX drawdown since its inception was -55.46%, which is greater than GSFTX's maximum drawdown of -47.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMIMX and GSFTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMIMX | GSFTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.46% | -47.69% | -7.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -10.18% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.06% | -17.01% | -6.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.47% | -32.76% | -1.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.81% | -3.94% | -2.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -6.40% | -0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 2.20% | +0.60% |
Volatility
NMIMX vs. GSFTX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Fund (NMIMX) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Columbia Dividend Income Fund (GSFTX) at 3.46%. This indicates that NMIMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSFTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NMIMX | GSFTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 3.46% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.73% | 7.00% | +2.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.72% | 13.68% | +5.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 13.30% | +3.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.24% | 15.68% | +2.56% |