PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMIMX vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMIMX vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Fund (NMIMX) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMIMX achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.47% return. Over the past 10 years, NMIMX has outperformed VYM with an annualized return of 15.13%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.90% annualized return.


NMIMX

1D
0.06%
1M
5.44%
YTD
9.04%
6M
10.33%
1Y
27.85%
3Y*
21.63%
5Y*
14.18%
10Y*
15.13%

VYM

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.38%
YTD
12.47%
6M
12.01%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMIMX vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMIMX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Fund
9.04%16.99%25.64%26.24%-16.99%31.73%15.48%25.87%-5.07%24.13%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.47%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between NMIMX and VYM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006

0.89

The correlation between NMIMX and VYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMIMX vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMIMX
NMIMX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NMIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
NMIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMIMX vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Fund (NMIMX) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMIMXVYMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.37

2.56

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.23

3.65

-0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

3.93

-0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.13

14.76

-1.63

NMIMX vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMIMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMIMX and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMIMXVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.56

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.83

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.73

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.51

+0.11

Drawdowns

NMIMX vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMIMX drawdown since its inception was -55.46%, roughly equal to the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMIMX and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMIMXVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.46%

-56.98%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-6.69%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.50%

-14.46%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.06%

-15.84%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.47%

-35.21%

+0.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.43%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-7.19%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.78%

+0.41%

Volatility

NMIMX vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Fund (NMIMX) is 2.62%, while Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that NMIMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMIMXVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

2.77%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.99%

7.67%

+1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

10.28%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

13.96%

+3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

16.34%

+1.91%

NMIMX vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMIMX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMIMX vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

NMIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.97%, more than VYM's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMIMX
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Fund
11.97%13.05%13.52%4.87%9.00%28.11%7.52%4.15%12.30%12.94%1.60%2.30%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMIMX and VYM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VYM has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to NMIMX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMIMX dropped -55.46% vs VYM's -56.98%.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMIMX and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer