NMIH vs. TBBK
NMIH (NMI Holdings, Inc.) and TBBK (The Bancorp, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — NMIH in Insurance - Specialty, TBBK in Banks - Regional. Over the past 10 years, NMIH returned 19.29%/yr vs 22.81%/yr for TBBK. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NMIH vs. TBBK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMIH achieves a -13.16% return, which is significantly higher than TBBK's -22.93% return. Over the past 10 years, NMIH has underperformed TBBK with an annualized return of 19.29%, while TBBK has yielded a comparatively higher 22.81% annualized return.
NMIH
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- YTD
- -13.16%
- 6M
- -7.28%
- 1Y
- -10.78%
- 3Y*
- 10.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- 19.29%
TBBK
- 1D
- -4.62%
- 1M
- -11.18%
- YTD
- -22.93%
- 6M
- -22.31%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- 15.53%
- 10Y*
- 22.81%
NMIH vs. TBBK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMIH NMI Holdings, Inc. | -13.16% | 10.96% | 23.85% | 42.01% | -4.35% | -3.53% | -31.74% | 85.88% | 5.00% | 59.62% |
TBBK The Bancorp, Inc. | -22.93% | 28.29% | 36.49% | 35.87% | 12.13% | 85.42% | 5.24% | 62.94% | -19.43% | 25.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between NMIH and TBBK is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2013 | 0.41 |
The correlation between NMIH and TBBK shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NMIH:
$2.74B
TBBK:
$2.22B
NMIH:
$1.27K
TBBK:
$5.09
NMIH:
0.03
TBBK:
10.21
NMIH:
0.00
TBBK:
0.37
NMIH:
0.02
TBBK:
3.44
NMIH:
0.00
TBBK:
3.18
NMIH:
$184.01B
TBBK:
$686.06M
NMIH:
$479.49M
TBBK:
$394.85M
NMIH:
$395.48M
TBBK:
$230.08M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NMIH vs. TBBK — Risk / Return Rank
NMIH
TBBK
NMIH vs. TBBK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) and The Bancorp, Inc. (TBBK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMIH | TBBK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | 0.09 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | 0.39 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.06 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 0.11 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | 0.19 | -1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMIH | TBBK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.45 | 0.09 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.34 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.45 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.10 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
NMIH vs. TBBK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMIH drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, smaller than the maximum TBBK drawdown of -92.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMIH and TBBK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMIH | TBBK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.07% | -92.68% | +19.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.08% | -35.92% | +17.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.42% | -36.28% | +14.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.78% | -48.94% | +7.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.07% | -73.77% | +0.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.91% | -35.23% | +17.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.81% | -47.56% | +20.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.94% | 19.78% | -8.84% |
Volatility
NMIH vs. TBBK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) is 6.80%, while The Bancorp, Inc. (TBBK) has a volatility of 9.92%. This indicates that NMIH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBBK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NMIH | TBBK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.80% | 9.92% | -3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.12% | 31.15% | -12.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.11% | 43.33% | -19.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.01% | 46.10% | -17.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.61% | 50.80% | -10.19% |
Dividends
NMIH vs. TBBK - Dividend Comparison
Neither NMIH nor TBBK has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
NMIH vs. TBBK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NMI Holdings, Inc. and The Bancorp, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NMIH vs. TBBK - Profitability Comparison
NMIH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NMI Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 183.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TBBK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bancorp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 72.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NMIH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NMI Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 183.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
TBBK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bancorp, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 72.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
NMIH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NMI Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 99.33B and revenue of 183.48B, resulting in a net margin of 54.1%.
TBBK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bancorp, Inc. reported a net income of 60.07M and revenue of 72.53M, resulting in a net margin of 82.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NMIH and TBBK have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TBBK has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to NMIH (6.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMIH dropped -73.07% vs TBBK's -92.68%.
TBBK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NMIH and TBBK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer