PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMIH vs. TBBK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NMIH vs. TBBK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) and The Bancorp, Inc. (TBBK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMIH achieves a -13.16% return, which is significantly higher than TBBK's -22.93% return. Over the past 10 years, NMIH has underperformed TBBK with an annualized return of 19.29%, while TBBK has yielded a comparatively higher 22.81% annualized return.


NMIH

1D
-0.62%
1M
-4.17%
YTD
-13.16%
6M
-7.28%
1Y
-10.78%
3Y*
10.71%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*
19.29%

TBBK

1D
-4.62%
1M
-11.18%
YTD
-22.93%
6M
-22.31%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
15.53%
10Y*
22.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMIH vs. TBBK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMIH
NMI Holdings, Inc.
-13.16%10.96%23.85%42.01%-4.35%-3.53%-31.74%85.88%5.00%59.62%
TBBK
The Bancorp, Inc.
-22.93%28.29%36.49%35.87%12.13%85.42%5.24%62.94%-19.43%25.70%

Correlation

The correlation between NMIH and TBBK is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2013

0.41

The correlation between NMIH and TBBK shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NMIH:

$2.74B

TBBK:

$2.22B

EPS

NMIH:

$1.27K

TBBK:

$5.09

PE Ratio

NMIH:

0.03

TBBK:

10.21

PEG Ratio

NMIH:

0.00

TBBK:

0.37

PS Ratio

NMIH:

0.02

TBBK:

3.44

PB Ratio

NMIH:

0.00

TBBK:

3.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

NMIH:

$184.01B

TBBK:

$686.06M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NMIH:

$479.49M

TBBK:

$394.85M

EBITDA (TTM)

NMIH:

$395.48M

TBBK:

$230.08M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMIH vs. TBBK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMIH
NMIH Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
NMIH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMIH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMIH Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
NMIH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMIH Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

TBBK
TBBK Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
TBBK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBBK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBBK Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
TBBK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBBK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMIH vs. TBBK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) and The Bancorp, Inc. (TBBK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMIHTBBKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.45

0.09

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.46

0.39

-0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.06

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

0.11

-0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.99

0.19

-1.18

NMIH vs. TBBK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMIH Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the TBBK Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMIH and TBBK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMIHTBBKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

0.09

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.34

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.45

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.10

+0.09

Drawdowns

NMIH vs. TBBK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMIH drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, smaller than the maximum TBBK drawdown of -92.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMIH and TBBK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMIHTBBKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.07%

-92.68%

+19.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.08%

-35.92%

+17.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.42%

-36.28%

+14.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.78%

-48.94%

+7.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.07%

-73.77%

+0.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.91%

-35.23%

+17.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.81%

-47.56%

+20.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.94%

19.78%

-8.84%

Volatility

NMIH vs. TBBK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) is 6.80%, while The Bancorp, Inc. (TBBK) has a volatility of 9.92%. This indicates that NMIH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBBK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMIHTBBKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.80%

9.92%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.12%

31.15%

-12.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.11%

43.33%

-19.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.01%

46.10%

-17.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.61%

50.80%

-10.19%

Dividends

NMIH vs. TBBK - Dividend Comparison

Neither NMIH nor TBBK has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

NMIH vs. TBBK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NMI Holdings, Inc. and The Bancorp, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
183.48B
72.53M
(NMIH) Total Revenue
(TBBK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NMIH vs. TBBK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NMI Holdings, Inc. and The Bancorp, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%2022202320242025202600
Portfolio components
NMIH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NMI Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 183.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TBBK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bancorp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 72.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NMIH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NMI Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 183.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

TBBK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bancorp, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 72.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

NMIH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NMI Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 99.33B and revenue of 183.48B, resulting in a net margin of 54.1%.

TBBK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Bancorp, Inc. reported a net income of 60.07M and revenue of 72.53M, resulting in a net margin of 82.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NMIH and TBBK have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TBBK has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to NMIH (6.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMIH dropped -73.07% vs TBBK's -92.68%.

TBBK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMIH and TBBK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer