NMIH vs. COST

In the year-to-date period, NMIH achieves a 27.76% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 41.42% return. Over the past 10 years, NMIH has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 15.50%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.47% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NMIH Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 3.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMIH and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

NMIH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.

The maximum NMIH drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMIH and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) has a higher volatility of 10.04% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 5.22%. This indicates that NMIH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NMI Holdings, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.