PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMI vs. MPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NMI vs. MPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI) and BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NMI vs. MPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMI
Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
5.52%10.52%7.03%1.90%-15.09%3.86%4.70%16.02%-8.07%7.49%
MPA
BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund
1.45%1.82%6.23%9.67%-31.00%17.06%9.14%18.87%-8.00%7.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMI achieves a 5.52% return, which is significantly higher than MPA's 1.45% return. Over the past 10 years, NMI has outperformed MPA with an annualized return of 2.30%, while MPA has yielded a comparatively lower 1.75% annualized return.


NMI

1D
-0.86%
1M
3.79%
YTD
5.52%
6M
6.73%
1Y
10.11%
3Y*
8.16%
5Y*
2.04%
10Y*
2.30%

MPA

1D
0.63%
1M
-3.41%
YTD
1.45%
6M
0.35%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
-0.68%
10Y*
1.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NMI vs. MPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMI has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than MPA's 2.28% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NMI vs. MPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMI
NMI Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
NMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMI Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMI Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

MPA
MPA Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPA Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPA Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMI vs. MPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI) and BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMIMPADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

0.54

+0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

0.78

+0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.11

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

0.75

+0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.37

2.51

-0.14

NMI vs. MPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMI Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the MPA Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMI and MPA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMIMPADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

0.54

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

-0.06

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.14

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.36

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between NMI and MPA is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NMI vs. MPA - Dividend Comparison

NMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, less than MPA's 6.48% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMI
Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc.
4.40%4.59%4.63%4.04%3.51%3.22%3.53%4.15%5.12%4.21%4.45%4.28%
MPA
BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund
6.48%6.98%6.02%3.63%5.60%3.94%4.12%4.16%5.40%5.22%5.56%5.94%

Drawdowns

NMI vs. MPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMI drawdown since its inception was -28.92%, smaller than the maximum MPA drawdown of -44.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMI and MPA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NMIMPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.92%

-44.78%

+15.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-7.07%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.92%

-38.10%

+9.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.92%

-38.10%

+9.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-19.26%

+18.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.93%

-9.72%

+3.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.31%

2.25%

+2.06%

Volatility

NMI vs. MPA - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA) at 3.84%. This indicates that NMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NMIMPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

3.84%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

5.93%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

10.02%

+2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.59%

12.15%

+1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.60%

12.30%

+2.30%