PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPA vs. VMTTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPA vs. VMTTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA) and Viking Tax-Free Fund For Montana (VMTTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPA achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly higher than VMTTX's 0.67% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MPA having a 1.03% annualized return and VMTTX not far behind at 0.99%.


MPA

1D
-0.64%
1M
-3.90%
6M
-2.20%
YTD
1.31%
1Y
7.16%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
-2.75%
10Y*
1.03%
ALL TIME*
4.61%

VMTTX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-1.63%
6M
-0.14%
YTD
0.67%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
2.18%
5Y*
-0.19%
10Y*
0.99%
ALL TIME*
1.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$344.29K$260.49K$329.66K
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MPA vs. VMTTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MPA
BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund
1.31%1.82%6.23%9.67%-31.00%17.06%9.14%18.87%-8.00%7.22%
VMTTX
Viking Tax-Free Fund For Montana
0.67%3.71%-0.16%4.24%-8.52%0.28%4.04%5.59%0.53%4.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MPA and VMTTX is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 1999

0.25

The correlation between MPA and VMTTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.38 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPA vs. VMTTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MPA
MPA Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPA Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPA Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VMTTX
VMTTX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VMTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
VMTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MPA vs. VMTTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA) and Viking Tax-Free Fund For Montana (VMTTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MPAVMTTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.85

-0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

2.75

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.85

10.52

-5.67

MPA vs. VMTTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the VMTTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPA and VMTTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MPA vs. VMTTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPA drawdown since its inception was -44.78%, which is greater than VMTTX's maximum drawdown of -13.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPA and VMTTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPAVMTTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.78%

-13.11%

-31.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

-2.27%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.75%

-5.55%

-9.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.10%

-13.11%

-24.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.10%

-13.11%

-24.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.37%

-1.63%

-17.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.80%

-2.48%

-7.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

0.59%

+1.12%

Volatility

MPA vs. VMTTX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA) has a higher volatility of 1.95% compared to Viking Tax-Free Fund For Montana (VMTTX) at 0.82%. This indicates that MPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMTTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPAVMTTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.95%

0.82%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.09%

1.80%

+4.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.21%

2.30%

+5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.07%

3.86%

+8.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.30%

3.66%

+8.64%

MPA vs. VMTTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPA has a 2.28% expense ratio, which is higher than VMTTX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPA vs. VMTTX - Dividend Comparison

MPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than VMTTX's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPA
BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund
5.92%6.98%6.02%3.63%5.60%3.94%4.12%4.16%5.40%5.22%5.56%5.94%
VMTTX
Viking Tax-Free Fund For Montana
2.77%2.93%2.81%2.47%2.06%1.55%1.89%2.63%2.52%2.61%2.77%2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


MPA and VMTTX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MPA has higher volatility (1.95%) compared to VMTTX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPA dropped -44.78% vs VMTTX's -13.11%.

VMTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPA and VMTTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer