NMHIX vs. NMANX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX) and Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX).
NMHIX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Jun 21, 2015. NMANX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Mar 1, 1979.
Performance
NMHIX vs. NMANX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NMHIX vs. NMANX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMHIX Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund | 0.23% | 3.56% | 6.27% | 4.34% | -14.26% | 4.90% | 4.04% | 8.28% | 2.19% | 8.75% |
NMANX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund | -4.02% | 5.51% | 24.39% | 18.21% | -28.82% | 12.42% | 39.45% | 33.62% | -6.28% | 29.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMHIX achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly higher than NMANX's -4.02% return. Over the past 10 years, NMHIX has underperformed NMANX with an annualized return of 2.39%, while NMANX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.19% annualized return.
NMHIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- 4.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.49%
- 10Y*
- 2.39%
NMANX
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -4.22%
- YTD
- -4.02%
- 6M
- -11.88%
- 1Y
- 8.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NMHIX vs. NMANX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMHIX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than NMANX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NMHIX vs. NMANX — Risk / Return Rank
NMHIX
NMANX
NMHIX vs. NMANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX) and Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMHIX | NMANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 0.43 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.96 | 0.76 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.10 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 0.63 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.41 | 1.95 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMHIX | NMANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.43 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.12 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.50 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.50 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between NMHIX and NMANX is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NMHIX vs. NMANX - Dividend Comparison
NMHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than NMANX's 24.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMHIX Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund | 3.68% | 3.98% | 3.81% | 3.11% | 2.43% | 2.74% | 2.90% | 3.36% | 3.64% | 3.44% | 4.42% | 0.00% |
NMANX Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund | 24.06% | 23.10% | 9.85% | 3.19% | 4.87% | 16.30% | 9.58% | 5.43% | 11.70% | 8.94% | 5.00% | 9.00% |
Drawdowns
NMHIX vs. NMANX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMHIX drawdown since its inception was -19.38%, smaller than the maximum NMANX drawdown of -72.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMHIX and NMANX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMHIX | NMANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.38% | -72.14% | +52.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.40% | -17.71% | +12.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.38% | -38.10% | +18.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.38% | -38.10% | +18.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.89% | -13.21% | +11.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.58% | -17.45% | +12.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.80% | 5.71% | -3.91% |
Volatility
NMHIX vs. NMANX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX) is 1.15%, while Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund (NMANX) has a volatility of 8.86%. This indicates that NMHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NMHIX | NMANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 8.86% | -7.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.79% | 16.46% | -14.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.38% | 23.80% | -18.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 23.15% | -18.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.70% | 22.36% | -17.66% |