PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMFIX vs. NOSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMFIX vs. NOSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Northern Stock Index Fund (NOSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMFIX achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly lower than NOSIX's 11.68% return. Over the past 10 years, NMFIX has underperformed NOSIX with an annualized return of 7.38%, while NOSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


NMFIX

1D
0.55%
1M
-1.93%
YTD
8.64%
6M
8.44%
1Y
16.19%
3Y*
12.04%
5Y*
6.93%
10Y*
7.38%

NOSIX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.79%
YTD
11.68%
6M
11.72%
1Y
28.94%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
14.18%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMFIX vs. NOSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMFIX
Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
8.64%23.11%1.74%6.62%-7.21%13.68%-2.59%24.34%-10.26%22.17%
NOSIX
Northern Stock Index Fund
11.68%17.83%24.87%26.24%-18.25%28.55%18.33%31.35%-4.54%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between NMFIX and NOSIX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2013

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between NMFIX and NOSIX has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMFIX vs. NOSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMFIX
NMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
NMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
NMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

NOSIX
NOSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
NOSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
NOSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMFIX vs. NOSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Northern Stock Index Fund (NOSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMFIXNOSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.47

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

3.38

-1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.75

15.86

-8.11

NMFIX vs. NOSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the NOSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMFIX and NOSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMFIXNOSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

2.52

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.83

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.86

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.50

+0.02

Drawdowns

NMFIX vs. NOSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMFIX drawdown since its inception was -34.93%, smaller than the maximum NOSIX drawdown of -55.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMFIX and NOSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMFIXNOSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.93%

-55.42%

+20.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-8.89%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.03%

-18.75%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.76%

-24.54%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.93%

-33.82%

-1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

0.00%

-4.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-10.33%

+5.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.89%

+0.19%

Volatility

NMFIX vs. NOSIX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to Northern Stock Index Fund (NOSIX) at 2.82%. This indicates that NMFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMFIXNOSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

2.82%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.33%

8.97%

+2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.91%

11.95%

+0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

17.20%

-3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.46%

18.21%

-2.75%

NMFIX vs. NOSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMFIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than NOSIX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMFIX vs. NOSIX - Dividend Comparison

NMFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, more than NOSIX's 2.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMFIX
Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund
5.59%6.03%3.82%2.78%3.98%10.13%2.11%2.47%10.33%7.71%2.53%2.01%
NOSIX
Northern Stock Index Fund
2.64%2.94%2.59%5.02%4.72%3.22%4.00%2.41%4.82%3.13%2.76%3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMFIX and NOSIX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMFIX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to NOSIX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMFIX dropped -34.93% vs NOSIX's -55.42%.

NOSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMFIX and NOSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer