NMFIX vs. CSUIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX).
NMFIX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Sep 17, 2012. CSUIX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on May 2, 2004.
Performance
NMFIX vs. CSUIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NMFIX vs. CSUIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 6.79% | 23.11% | 1.74% | 6.62% | -7.21% | 13.68% | -2.59% | 24.34% | -10.26% | 22.17% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 8.44% | 14.69% | 8.74% | 2.46% | -4.89% | 16.60% | -1.29% | 24.72% | -5.52% | 18.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMFIX achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly lower than CSUIX's 8.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NMFIX having a 7.52% annualized return and CSUIX not far ahead at 7.83%.
NMFIX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- 6.79%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- 1Y
- 22.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 7.52%
CSUIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.36%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 11.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NMFIX vs. CSUIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMFIX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than CSUIX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NMFIX vs. CSUIX — Risk / Return Rank
NMFIX
CSUIX
NMFIX vs. CSUIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMFIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | 1.67 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.28 | 2.21 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.33 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 2.42 | +0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 10.58 | +1.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMFIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | 1.67 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.64 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.53 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.58 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between NMFIX and CSUIX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NMFIX vs. CSUIX - Dividend Comparison
NMFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, less than CSUIX's 7.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 5.68% | 6.03% | 3.82% | 2.78% | 3.98% | 10.13% | 2.11% | 2.47% | 10.33% | 7.71% | 2.53% | 2.01% |
CSUIX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. | 7.76% | 8.41% | 2.58% | 2.53% | 3.91% | 3.25% | 1.64% | 1.83% | 2.45% | 5.12% | 2.35% | 6.52% |
Drawdowns
NMFIX vs. CSUIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMFIX drawdown since its inception was -34.93%, smaller than the maximum CSUIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMFIX and CSUIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMFIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.93% | -52.01% | +17.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.81% | -7.99% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.76% | -20.01% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.93% | -35.01% | +0.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.75% | -4.36% | -1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.34% | -8.21% | +2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 1.82% | +0.12% |
Volatility
NMFIX vs. CSUIX - Volatility Comparison
Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund, Inc. (CSUIX) at 3.24%. This indicates that NMFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NMFIX | CSUIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 3.24% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 6.90% | +3.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.55% | 11.49% | +3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 12.86% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 14.88% | +0.55% |