NMBL vs. ALTY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NMBL (NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF) and ALTY (Global X Alternative Income ETF) are both Global Allocation funds. NMBL is actively managed, while ALTY is passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NMBL charges 1.99%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for ALTY.

Performance

NMBL vs. ALTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF (NMBL) and Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMBL achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly lower than ALTY's 6.19% return.

NMBL

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: 0.88%
• YTD: 5.30%
• 6M: 5.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ALTY

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 6.19%
• 6M: 6.51%
• 1Y: 15.73%
• 3Y*: 11.40%
• 5Y*: 5.55%
• 10Y*: 6.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMBL vs. ALTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NMBL NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF	5.30%	-0.27%
ALTY Global X Alternative Income ETF	6.19%	2.05%

Correlation

The correlation between NMBL and ALTY is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2025	0.72

Return for Risk

NMBL vs. ALTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALTY

ALTY Risk / Return Rank: 82
ALTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
ALTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
ALTY Omega Ratio Rank: 86
ALTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ALTY Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMBL vs. ALTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF (NMBL) and Global X Alternative Income ETF (ALTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NMBL	ALTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.33	+0.41

Drawdowns

NMBL vs. ALTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMBL drawdown since its inception was -8.05%, smaller than the maximum ALTY drawdown of -51.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMBL and ALTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMBL	ALTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.05%	-51.47%	+43.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.34%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.08%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-0.37%	-0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.93%	-6.75%	+4.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.94%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NMBL	ALTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.41%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.38%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.91%	5.79%	+6.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.91%	10.61%	+1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.91%	16.58%	-4.67%

NMBL vs. ALTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMBL has a 1.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ALTY's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

NMBL vs. ALTY - Dividend Comparison

NMBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than ALTY's 8.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALTY Global X Alternative Income ETF	8.08%	7.50%	7.88%	7.31%	7.66%	6.88%	9.20%	8.74%	8.49%	7.52%	8.20%	4.21%
NMBL NovaTide Flexible Allocation ETF	0.88%	0.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMBL and ALTY in my portfolio?

NMBL and ALTY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NMBL or ALTY?

On fees, ALTY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NMBL or ALTY?

ALTY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.99% for NMBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NMBL or ALTY?

ALTY has the higher dividend yield at 8.08%, compared with 0.88% for NMBL.

What is the main difference between NMBL and ALTY?

They also come from different issuers: NovaTide and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.99% for NMBL and 0.50% for ALTY.