NMAVX vs. FASOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX).
NMAVX is managed by Nuance Investments. It was launched on Dec 31, 2013. FASOX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995.
Performance
NMAVX vs. FASOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NMAVX vs. FASOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMAVX Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund | 1.05% | 1.91% | 5.20% | 6.44% | -5.26% | 11.10% | 4.41% | 30.71% | -5.44% | 14.81% |
FASOX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I | 3.45% | 8.28% | -2.00% | 20.51% | -7.38% | 33.31% | 8.21% | 34.49% | -16.90% | 17.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMAVX achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than FASOX's 3.45% return. Over the past 10 years, NMAVX has underperformed FASOX with an annualized return of 7.57%, while FASOX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.77% annualized return.
NMAVX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -8.71%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 3.78%
- 1Y
- 9.27%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
FASOX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -8.92%
- YTD
- 3.45%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- 1Y
- 21.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NMAVX vs. FASOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMAVX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FASOX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NMAVX vs. FASOX — Risk / Return Rank
NMAVX
FASOX
NMAVX vs. FASOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMAVX | FASOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 0.97 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.10 | 1.50 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.20 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 1.29 | -0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.21 | 5.24 | -3.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMAVX | FASOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 0.97 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.34 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.45 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.40 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between NMAVX and FASOX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NMAVX vs. FASOX - Dividend Comparison
NMAVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than FASOX's 8.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMAVX Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.99% | 1.00% | 7.55% | 1.78% | 9.05% | 11.98% | 0.61% | 5.91% | 7.16% | 7.05% | 1.83% | 4.24% |
FASOX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I | 8.73% | 9.03% | 0.00% | 2.74% | 2.34% | 7.97% | 0.91% | 5.21% | 15.65% | 7.00% | 20.89% | 1.24% |
Drawdowns
NMAVX vs. FASOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMAVX drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, smaller than the maximum FASOX drawdown of -69.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMAVX and FASOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMAVX | FASOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.93% | -69.86% | +38.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.80% | -15.25% | +5.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.40% | -34.34% | +15.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.93% | -47.97% | +17.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.71% | -9.79% | +1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -9.75% | +5.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 3.75% | -0.64% |
Volatility
NMAVX vs. FASOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX) is 3.57%, while Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that NMAVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NMAVX | FASOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 5.25% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.57% | 12.53% | -4.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.28% | 22.48% | -8.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 20.60% | -7.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.05% | 21.95% | -6.90% |