PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMAI vs. TIBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NMAI vs. TIBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund (NMAI) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NMAI vs. TIBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NMAI
Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund
-0.81%20.03%11.65%19.52%-26.38%-1.71%
TIBAX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund
9.81%36.62%13.23%18.01%-7.95%3.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMAI achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly lower than TIBAX's 9.81% return.


NMAI

1D
1.61%
1M
-7.60%
YTD
-0.81%
6M
1.95%
1Y
14.82%
3Y*
15.51%
5Y*
10Y*

TIBAX

1D
1.70%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
9.81%
6M
16.81%
1Y
37.83%
3Y*
23.93%
5Y*
15.19%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NMAI vs. TIBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMAI has a 2.91% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBAX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NMAI vs. TIBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMAI
NMAI Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
NMAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMAI Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
NMAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMAI Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

TIBAX
TIBAX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TIBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
TIBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMAI vs. TIBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund (NMAI) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMAITIBAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.97

3.55

-2.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.36

4.51

-3.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.79

-0.58

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

4.40

-3.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.10

21.51

-16.41

NMAI vs. TIBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMAI Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the TIBAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMAI and TIBAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMAITIBAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

3.55

-2.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.77

-0.58

Correlation

The correlation between NMAI and TIBAX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NMAI vs. TIBAX - Dividend Comparison

NMAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.68%, more than TIBAX's 5.21% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMAI
Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund
9.68%9.89%13.73%10.57%19.45%1.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TIBAX
Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund
5.21%5.64%5.44%4.67%5.62%5.10%4.11%4.23%4.49%4.22%3.83%4.31%

Drawdowns

NMAI vs. TIBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMAI drawdown since its inception was -35.61%, smaller than the maximum TIBAX drawdown of -49.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMAI and TIBAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NMAITIBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.61%

-49.12%

+13.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.88%

-8.57%

-3.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.93%

-3.52%

-4.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.00%

-6.03%

-6.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

1.75%

+1.23%

Volatility

NMAI vs. TIBAX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Multi-Asset Income Fund (NMAI) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund (TIBAX) at 3.65%. This indicates that NMAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NMAITIBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

3.65%

+2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.64%

6.54%

+3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.34%

10.79%

+4.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.61%

11.07%

+5.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.61%

13.44%

+3.17%