PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NLY vs. WMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NLY vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLY achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, NLY has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of 5.96%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.77% annualized return.


NLY

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
1.74%
6M
5.83%
1Y
29.27%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
2.68%
10Y*
5.96%

WMT

1D
0.45%
1M
-7.93%
YTD
9.07%
6M
4.13%
1Y
28.71%
3Y*
34.18%
5Y*
22.42%
10Y*
19.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLY vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NLY
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
1.74%40.00%8.07%4.94%-21.41%2.48%2.38%7.22%-7.22%31.92%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
9.07%24.49%73.99%12.88%-0.46%1.97%23.32%30.16%-3.43%46.56%

Correlation

The correlation between NLY and WMT is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 1997

0.15

The correlation between NLY and WMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NLY:

$15.94B

WMT:

$968.20B

EPS

NLY:

$3.28

WMT:

$2.88

PE Ratio

NLY:

6.70

WMT:

42.04

PS Ratio

NLY:

2.81

WMT:

1.34

PB Ratio

NLY:

1.10

WMT:

10.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

NLY:

$5.21B

WMT:

$725.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NLY:

$5.17B

WMT:

$181.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

NLY:

$5.65B

WMT:

$44.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NLY vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLY
NLY Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

WMT
WMT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLY vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NLYWMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.83

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.80

5.82

-0.02

NLY vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLY Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLY and WMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NLY vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLY drawdown since its inception was -60.09%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLY and WMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NLYWMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.09%

-77.14%

+17.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.88%

-15.75%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.70%

-21.93%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.99%

-25.74%

-25.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.09%

-25.74%

-34.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.77%

-9.81%

+3.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.83%

-14.63%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.07%

4.94%

+0.13%

Volatility

NLY vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) is 6.20%, while Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that NLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NLYWMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

9.86%

-3.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.27%

18.49%

-3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.07%

23.67%

-4.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.61%

21.68%

+3.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.14%

21.73%

+6.41%

Dividends

NLY vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

NLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.73%, more than WMT's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NLY
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
12.73%12.52%14.21%13.42%16.70%11.25%10.77%11.15%12.22%10.09%12.04%12.79%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.80%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%

Financials

NLY vs. WMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Annaly Capital Management, Inc. and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B202220232024202520260
177.75B
(NLY) Total Revenue
(WMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NLY and WMT have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMT has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to NLY (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLY dropped -60.09% vs WMT's -77.14%.

NLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NLY and WMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer