PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NLY vs. CIM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NLY vs. CIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) and Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLY achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly lower than CIM's 26.08% return. Over the past 10 years, NLY has outperformed CIM with an annualized return of 5.88%, while CIM has yielded a comparatively lower -0.98% annualized return.


NLY

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.84%
6M
6.49%
YTD
8.73%
1Y
24.07%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
5.88%
ALL TIME*
9.45%

CIM

1D
0.32%
1M
11.41%
6M
26.18%
YTD
26.08%
1Y
21.38%
3Y*
4.33%
5Y*
-10.02%
10Y*
-0.98%
ALL TIME*
-1.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.99M$7.85M$8.99M
$202.32M$168.63M$172.32M

NLY vs. CIM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NLY
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
8.73%40.00%8.07%4.94%-21.41%2.48%2.38%7.22%-7.22%31.92%
CIM
Chimera Investment Corporation
26.08%-0.65%3.61%2.95%-57.95%60.73%-42.97%27.65%7.71%17.30%

Correlation

The correlation between NLY and CIM is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2007

0.60

The correlation between NLY and CIM shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NLY:

$17.15B

CIM:

$1.06B

EPS

NLY:

$4.25

CIM:

$0.23

PE Ratio

NLY:

5.35

CIM:

54.23

PS Ratio

NLY:

4.62

CIM:

2.10

PB Ratio

NLY:

1.10

CIM:

0.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

NLY:

$3.42B

CIM:

$499.18M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NLY:

$3.40B

CIM:

$465.68M

EBITDA (TTM)

NLY:

$8.16B

CIM:

$439.34M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NLY vs. CIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NLY
NLY Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

CIM
CIM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
CIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIM Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NLY vs. CIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) and Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NLYCIMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.17

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

1.18

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.64

2.87

+1.77

NLY vs. CIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLY Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the CIM Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLY and CIM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NLY vs. CIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLY drawdown since its inception was -60.09%, smaller than the maximum CIM drawdown of -89.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLY and CIM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NLYCIMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.09%

-89.69%

+29.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.88%

-18.18%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.28%

-33.07%

+6.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.21%

-69.09%

+18.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.09%

-72.35%

+12.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-53.92%

+51.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.77%

-51.80%

+38.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.21%

7.48%

-2.27%

Volatility

NLY vs. CIM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) is 5.52%, while Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) has a volatility of 14.00%. This indicates that NLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NLYCIMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.52%

14.00%

-8.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

21.14%

-6.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.54%

28.68%

-9.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.52%

35.63%

-10.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.20%

36.78%

-8.58%

Dividends

NLY vs. CIM - Dividend Comparison

NLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.53%, less than CIM's 26.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIM
Chimera Investment Corporation
26.35%11.91%10.14%14.03%20.36%8.55%13.66%9.73%11.22%8.12%14.34%28.15%
NLY
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
12.53%12.52%14.21%13.42%16.70%11.25%10.77%11.15%12.22%10.09%12.04%12.79%

Financials

NLY vs. CIM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Annaly Capital Management, Inc. and Chimera Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NLY and CIM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIM has higher volatility (14.00%) compared to NLY (5.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLY dropped -60.09% vs CIM's -89.69%.

NLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NLY and CIM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer