PortfoliosLab logo
NLY vs. EFC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NLY and EFC is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

NLY vs. EFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) and Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NLY:

0.49

EFC:

1.16

Sortino Ratio

NLY:

0.94

EFC:

1.91

Omega Ratio

NLY:

1.12

EFC:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

NLY:

0.52

EFC:

1.48

Martin Ratio

NLY:

2.54

EFC:

5.03

Ulcer Index

NLY:

5.19%

EFC:

5.53%

Daily Std Dev

NLY:

21.94%

EFC:

21.28%

Max Drawdown

NLY:

-60.09%

EFC:

-79.08%

Current Drawdown

NLY:

-12.06%

EFC:

-5.61%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NLY:

$11.84B

EFC:

$1.23B

EPS

NLY:

$0.92

EFC:

$1.39

PE Ratio

NLY:

21.23

EFC:

9.37

PEG Ratio

NLY:

-3.61

EFC:

0.86

PS Ratio

NLY:

12.38

EFC:

3.99

PB Ratio

NLY:

1.03

EFC:

0.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

NLY:

$4.86B

EFC:

$284.66M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NLY:

$3.75B

EFC:

$212.38M

EBITDA (TTM)

NLY:

$3.67B

EFC:

$216.47M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLY achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly lower than EFC's 14.03% return. Over the past 10 years, NLY has underperformed EFC with an annualized return of 5.10%, while EFC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.60% annualized return.


NLY

YTD

11.48%

1M

9.74%

6M

7.89%

1Y

10.68%

5Y*

10.18%

10Y*

5.10%

EFC

YTD

14.03%

1M

10.93%

6M

15.91%

1Y

24.45%

5Y*

19.99%

10Y*

7.60%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

NLY vs. EFC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NLY is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NLY is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NLY is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NLY is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NLY is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NLY is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

EFC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EFC is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EFC is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EFC is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EFC is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EFC is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EFC is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NLY vs. EFC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) and Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the EFC Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLY and EFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

NLY vs. EFC - Dividend Comparison

NLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.44%, more than EFC's 11.75% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NLY
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
13.44%14.21%13.42%16.70%11.25%10.77%11.15%12.22%10.09%12.04%12.79%11.10%
EFC
Ellington Financial Inc.
11.75%13.20%14.16%14.55%9.60%8.49%9.87%10.70%12.13%12.56%14.60%15.43%

Drawdowns

NLY vs. EFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLY drawdown since its inception was -60.09%, smaller than the maximum EFC drawdown of -79.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLY and EFC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

NLY vs. EFC - Volatility Comparison

Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) has a higher volatility of 6.36% compared to Ellington Financial Inc. (EFC) at 5.43%. This indicates that NLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NLY vs. EFC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Annaly Capital Management, Inc. and Ellington Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-3.00B-2.00B-1.00B0.001.00B2.00B20212022202320242025
1.44B
72.28M
(NLY) Total Revenue
(EFC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items