PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NLY vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NLY vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLY achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.48% return.


NLY

1D
0.65%
1M
7.62%
6M
6.09%
YTD
10.69%
1Y
35.64%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*
6.51%

IBIC

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.14%
6M
2.32%
YTD
2.48%
1Y
4.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLY vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NLY
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
10.69%40.00%8.07%0.55%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.48%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between NLY and IBIC is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.05

The correlation between NLY and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NLY vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLY
NLY Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
NLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLY Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
NLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLY Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLY vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NLYIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

2.08

-0.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

15.39

-12.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.92

52.15

-45.23

NLY vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLY Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLY and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NLY vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLY drawdown since its inception was -60.09%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLY and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NLYIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.09%

-0.90%

-59.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.88%

-0.27%

-14.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.15%

+0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.79%

-0.10%

-13.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.16%

0.08%

+5.08%

Volatility

NLY vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.31%. This indicates that NLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NLYIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.25%

0.31%

+4.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.35%

0.69%

+14.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.41%

0.91%

+18.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.57%

1.56%

+24.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.17%

1.56%

+26.61%

Dividends

NLY vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

NLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.31%, more than IBIC's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
4.63%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NLY
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
12.31%12.52%14.21%13.42%16.70%11.25%10.77%11.15%12.22%10.09%12.04%12.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


NLY and IBIC have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NLY has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to IBIC (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLY dropped -60.09% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.54 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NLY and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer