PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NLSIX vs. NMULX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NLSIX vs. NMULX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund (NMULX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLSIX achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly lower than NMULX's 6.06% return. Over the past 10 years, NLSIX has underperformed NMULX with an annualized return of 6.86%, while NMULX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.09% annualized return.


NLSIX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.64%
YTD
2.34%
6M
1.99%
1Y
6.09%
3Y*
7.70%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*
6.86%

NMULX

1D
0.08%
1M
2.39%
YTD
6.06%
6M
5.89%
1Y
18.88%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
13.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLSIX vs. NMULX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund
2.34%7.20%7.47%13.10%-6.85%9.01%15.27%17.11%-6.92%13.39%
NMULX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund
6.06%14.81%20.55%18.35%-17.68%26.48%12.47%28.20%-4.78%24.90%

Correlation

The correlation between NLSIX and NMULX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2011

0.82

The correlation between NLSIX and NMULX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NLSIX vs. NMULX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLSIX
NLSIX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NLSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NLSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

NMULX
NMULX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
NMULX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMULX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMULX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
NMULX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMULX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLSIX vs. NMULX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund (NMULX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NLSIXNMULXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.31

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

2.29

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.44

9.54

-4.10

NLSIX vs. NMULX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the NMULX Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLSIX and NMULX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NLSIXNMULXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

1.73

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.47

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.63

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.46

+0.50

Drawdowns

NLSIX vs. NMULX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLSIX drawdown since its inception was -14.75%, smaller than the maximum NMULX drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLSIX and NMULX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NLSIXNMULXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.75%

-56.00%

+41.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.39%

-8.51%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.90%

-19.50%

+12.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.79%

-26.05%

+15.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.75%

-39.41%

+24.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.48%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-9.59%

+7.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

2.04%

-0.91%

Volatility

NLSIX vs. NMULX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) is 1.42%, while Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund (NMULX) has a volatility of 3.00%. This indicates that NLSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMULX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NLSIXNMULXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

3.00%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.93%

8.59%

-4.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.91%

11.29%

-6.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.66%

21.21%

-14.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.32%

20.86%

-13.54%

NLSIX vs. NMULX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLSIX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than NMULX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

NLSIX vs. NMULX - Dividend Comparison

NLSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than NMULX's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund
0.05%0.05%0.02%0.97%7.01%1.13%2.15%2.39%5.91%0.00%0.00%0.01%
NMULX
Neuberger Berman Multi-Cap Opportunities Fund
0.65%0.69%2.93%22.77%30.16%34.21%24.27%20.47%11.21%10.49%3.61%3.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


NLSIX and NMULX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMULX has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to NLSIX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLSIX dropped -14.75% vs NMULX's -56.00%.

NMULX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NLSIX and NMULX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer