NLSIX vs. CDAZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund (CDAZX).
NLSIX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Dec 28, 2011. CDAZX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jan 2, 2017.
Performance
NLSIX vs. CDAZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NLSIX achieves a -2.14% return, which is significantly lower than CDAZX's -1.68% return.
NLSIX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- -2.14%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 8.32%
- 3Y*
- 6.86%
- 5Y*
- 4.94%
- 10Y*
- 6.55%
CDAZX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 6M
- 5.20%
- 1Y
- 21.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.15%
- 10Y*
- —
NLSIX vs. CDAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund | -2.14% | 7.20% | 7.47% | 13.10% | -6.85% | 9.01% | 15.27% | 17.11% | -6.92% | 12.35% |
CDAZX Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund | -1.68% | 19.20% | 19.75% | 3.90% | 1.31% | 20.14% | -6.39% | 8.17% | -12.03% | 10.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between NLSIX and CDAZX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined. Holding both can reduce overall portfolio volatility compared to holding either one alone.
NLSIX vs. CDAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLSIX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is lower than CDAZX's 1.84% expense ratio.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NLSIX vs. CDAZX — Risk / Return Rank
NLSIX
CDAZX
NLSIX vs. CDAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) and Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund (CDAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NLSIX | CDAZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 2.01 | -1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 2.90 | -1.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.38 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 2.66 | -1.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.22 | 10.96 | -6.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NLSIX | CDAZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 2.01 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 1.12 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.62 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
NLSIX vs. CDAZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLSIX drawdown since its inception was -14.75%, smaller than the maximum CDAZX drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLSIX and CDAZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NLSIX | CDAZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.75% | -30.94% | +16.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.39% | -7.32% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.79% | -10.91% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.91% | -5.01% | +2.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -6.22% | +4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.20% | 1.78% | -0.58% |
Volatility
NLSIX vs. CDAZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund (NLSIX) is 2.36%, while Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund (CDAZX) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that NLSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDAZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NLSIX | CDAZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.36% | 3.40% | -1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.64% | 7.10% | -3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.46% | 9.34% | -2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.65% | 9.09% | -2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.30% | 10.00% | -2.70% |
Dividends
NLSIX vs. CDAZX - Dividend Comparison
NLSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than CDAZX's 23.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLSIX Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.02% | 0.97% | 7.01% | 1.13% | 2.15% | 2.39% | 5.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
CDAZX Multi-Manager Directional Alternative Strategies Fund | 23.67% | 23.28% | 10.21% | 1.58% | 11.48% | 6.28% | 0.00% | 0.79% | 50.33% | 3.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% |