NLSI vs. SENT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NLSI (Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF) and SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) are both Long-Short funds. NLSI is actively managed, while SENT is passively managed. NLSI charges 2.89%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SENT.

Performance

NLSI vs. SENT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NLSI

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 10.92%
• YTD: 7.01%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLSI vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF	7.01%	1.90%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Return for Risk

NLSI vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NLSI	SENT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	-0.25	+1.29

Drawdowns

NLSI vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLSI drawdown since its inception was -13.82%, smaller than the maximum SENT drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLSI and SENT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NLSI	SENT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.82%	-30.34%	+16.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	0.00%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	-27.23%	+25.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.10%	-20.90%	+14.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NLSI	SENT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.37%	0.00%	+19.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.37%	12.66%	+6.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.37%	13.32%	+6.05%

NLSI vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLSI has a 2.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

NLSI vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison

NLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, while SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF	2.42%	0.46%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, NLSI or SENT?

On fees, SENT is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NLSI or SENT?

SENT is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 2.89% for NLSI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NLSI or SENT?

NLSI has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.00% for SENT.

What is the main difference between NLSI and SENT?

They also come from different issuers: Neos and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 2.89% for NLSI and 1.01% for SENT.