NLSI vs. ATTR
NLSI (Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF) and ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NLSI charges 2.89%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for ATTR.
Performance
NLSI vs. ATTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NLSI achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly higher than ATTR's 4.33% return.
NLSI
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- 9.30%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATTR
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 4.33%
- 6M
- 4.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NLSI vs. ATTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF | 5.89% | 1.90% |
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 4.33% | 0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between NLSI and ATTR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NLSI vs. ATTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI) and Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NLSI | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 2.85 | -1.96 |
Drawdowns
NLSI vs. ATTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLSI drawdown since its inception was -13.82%, which is greater than ATTR's maximum drawdown of -1.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLSI and ATTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NLSI | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.82% | -1.76% | -12.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -0.11% | -2.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.07% | -0.18% | -5.89% |
Volatility
NLSI vs. ATTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NLSI | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.36% | 2.96% | +16.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 2.96% | +16.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 2.96% | +16.40% |
NLSI vs. ATTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLSI has a 2.89% expense ratio, which is higher than ATTR's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
NLSI vs. ATTR - Dividend Comparison
NLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, while ATTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF | 2.45% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NLSI and ATTR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 2.89% for NLSI.
NLSI has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.00% for ATTR.
They also come from different issuers: Neos and Arin Risk Advisors. Their fees differ too: 2.89% for NLSI and 0.63% for ATTR.
Find the right allocation for NLSI and ATTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer