NLR vs. XLI
NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) and XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NLR is a Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while XLI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, NLR returned 10.66%/yr vs 13.76%/yr for XLI. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NLR charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLI.
Performance
NLR vs. XLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a -15.40% return, which is significantly lower than XLI's 15.43% return. Over the past 10 years, NLR has underperformed XLI with an annualized return of 10.66%, while XLI has yielded a comparatively higher 13.76% annualized return.
NLR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -17.23%
- 6M
- -29.26%
- YTD
- -15.40%
- 1Y
- -8.06%
- 3Y*
- 23.46%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 10.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.20%
XLI
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- 6M
- 7.29%
- YTD
- 15.43%
- 1Y
- 19.12%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.61%
NLR vs. XLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | -15.40% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 3.49% | 0.20% | 4.94% | 8.25% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 15.43% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between NLR and XLI is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2007 | 0.57 |
The correlation between NLR and XLI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
NLR vs. XLI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NLR
XLI
Energy
-
Utilities
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Energy
NLR
XLI
-
Utilities
NLR
XLI
Industrials
NLR
XLI
Basic Materials
NLR
XLI
Technology
NLR
XLI
Communication Services
NLR
-
XLI
-
Consumer Cyclical
NLR
-
XLI
Consumer Defensive
NLR
-
XLI
-
Financial Services
NLR
-
XLI
-
Healthcare
NLR
-
XLI
-
Real Estate
NLR
-
XLI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NLR vs. XLI — Risk / Return Rank
NLR
XLI
NLR vs. XLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NLR | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.20 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 1.57 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 6.09 | -6.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NLR vs. XLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -65.05%, roughly equal to the maximum XLI drawdown of -62.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and XLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NLR | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.05% | -62.26% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -12.21% | -24.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.61% | -18.49% | -18.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.61% | -21.64% | -14.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.61% | -42.33% | +5.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.08% | -4.01% | -32.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.67% | -9.17% | -26.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.20% | 3.15% | +13.05% |
Volatility
NLR vs. XLI - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a higher volatility of 9.51% compared to Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) at 5.03%. This indicates that NLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NLR | XLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.51% | 5.03% | +4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.62% | 13.80% | +18.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.18% | 16.68% | +26.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.88% | 17.53% | +12.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.43% | 20.01% | +4.42% |
NLR vs. XLI - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLR has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than XLI's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
NLR vs. XLI - Dividend Comparison
NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than XLI's 1.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 3.01% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NLR and XLI have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NLR has higher volatility (9.51%) compared to XLI (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLR dropped -65.05% vs XLI's -62.26%.
On 10-year performance, XLI leads with 13.76% vs 10.66% for NLR. On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLI has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLI has performed better with a 13.76% return vs 10.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.
NLR has the higher dividend yield at 3.01%, compared with 1.16% for XLI.
NLR is categorized as Uranium, while XLI is Industrials Equities. NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NLR and 0.08% for XLI.
XLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NLR and XLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer