NLR vs. FLIN

Last updated Jun 12, 2026

NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) and FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NLR is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while FLIN is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE India RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NLR returned 19.58%/yr vs 3.66%/yr for FLIN. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NLR charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLIN.

Performance

NLR vs. FLIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a -2.62% return, which is significantly higher than FLIN's -11.27% return.

NLR

• 1D: 4.69%
• 1M: -13.55%
• YTD: -2.62%
• 6M: -10.27%
• 1Y: 17.88%
• 3Y*: 29.43%
• 5Y*: 19.58%
• 10Y*: 12.59%

FLIN

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: -11.27%
• 6M: -10.27%
• 1Y: -13.20%
• 3Y*: 5.71%
• 5Y*: 3.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLR vs. FLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	-2.62%	56.50%	14.26%	36.67%	2.29%	13.63%	3.49%	0.20%	10.27%
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF	-11.27%	2.40%	10.33%	20.58%	-7.96%	24.96%	14.50%	4.77%	-7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between NLR and FLIN is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2018	0.37

The correlation between NLR and FLIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NLR vs. FLIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NLR	FLIN
Energy	46.0%	9.5%
Utilities	37.4%	5.3%
Industrials	15.1%	10.3%
Technology	1.5%	8.4%
Basic Materials	-	9.2%
Communication Services	-	4.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.8%
Financial Services	-	27.2%
Healthcare	-	6.5%
Real Estate	-	1.3%

Return for Risk

NLR vs. FLIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 18
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 19
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 17

FLIN

FLIN Risk / Return Rank: 3
FLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
FLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 3
FLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLR vs. FLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NLR	FLIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	-0.88	+1.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.87	-1.22	+2.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	0.86	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	-0.71	+1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.36	-1.68	+3.03

NLR vs. FLIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is higher than the FLIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLR and FLIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NLR vs. FLIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -65.05%, which is greater than FLIN's maximum drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and FLIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	NLR	FLIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.05%	-41.90%	-23.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.72%	-18.79%	-10.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.48%	-22.85%	-7.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.48%	-22.85%	-7.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.42%	-18.31%	-8.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.70%	-8.03%	-27.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.23%	7.89%	+5.34%

Volatility

NLR vs. FLIN - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a higher volatility of 13.79% compared to Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) at 4.13%. This indicates that NLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NLR	FLIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.79%	4.13%	+9.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.75%	12.84%	+20.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.23%	14.99%	+28.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.57%	15.76%	+13.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.22%	20.43%	+3.79%

NLR vs. FLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLR has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than FLIN's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

NLR vs. FLIN - Dividend Comparison

NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than FLIN's 0.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF	0.63%	0.56%	1.58%	0.73%	0.73%	2.26%	0.68%	0.90%	0.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	2.62%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NLR and FLIN in my portfolio?

NLR and FLIN have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NLR or FLIN?

NLR has higher volatility (13.79%) compared to FLIN (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLR dropped -65.05% vs FLIN's -41.90%.

Which ETF is better, NLR or FLIN?

On 5-year performance, NLR leads with 19.58% vs 3.66% for FLIN. On fees, FLIN is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLIN has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NLR or FLIN?

Over the 5-year period, NLR has performed better with a 19.58% return vs 3.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NLR or FLIN?

FLIN is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NLR or FLIN?

NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.63% for FLIN.

What is the main difference between NLR and FLIN?

NLR is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while FLIN is Asia Pacific Equities. NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NLR and 0.19% for FLIN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.