NLR vs. EPDPX
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A (EPDPX).
NLR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2007. EPDPX is managed by Euro Pacific Asset Management. It was launched on Jan 10, 2014.
Performance
NLR vs. EPDPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NLR vs. EPDPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 8.18% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 3.49% | 0.20% | 4.94% | 8.25% |
EPDPX EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A | 8.52% | 61.93% | 0.72% | 7.46% | 1.27% | 7.78% | 8.83% | 13.05% | -11.02% | 15.53% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NLR having a 8.18% return and EPDPX slightly higher at 8.52%. Over the past 10 years, NLR has outperformed EPDPX with an annualized return of 13.96%, while EPDPX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.83% annualized return.
NLR
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -12.66%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- 85.99%
- 3Y*
- 37.72%
- 5Y*
- 23.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
EPDPX
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -6.52%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 6M
- 18.76%
- 1Y
- 47.83%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 14.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NLR vs. EPDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EPDPX's 1.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NLR vs. EPDPX — Risk / Return Rank
NLR
EPDPX
NLR vs. EPDPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A (EPDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NLR | EPDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 2.99 | -0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.62 | 3.53 | -0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.57 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 4.39 | -0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | 17.85 | -9.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NLR | EPDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.99 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 1.06 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.66 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.45 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between NLR and EPDPX is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NLR vs. EPDPX - Dividend Comparison
NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, less than EPDPX's 5.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 2.36% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
EPDPX EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A | 5.68% | 6.55% | 3.82% | 3.08% | 2.56% | 2.07% | 1.70% | 2.43% | 2.66% | 2.69% | 2.24% | 3.58% |
Drawdowns
NLR vs. EPDPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -65.05%, which is greater than EPDPX's maximum drawdown of -39.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and EPDPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NLR | EPDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.05% | -39.21% | -25.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.80% | -10.96% | -14.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.48% | -21.06% | -9.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.35% | -33.34% | -1.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.26% | -7.16% | -11.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.90% | -11.30% | -24.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.73% | 2.70% | +8.03% |
Volatility
NLR vs. EPDPX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) has a higher volatility of 12.53% compared to EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A (EPDPX) at 7.11%. This indicates that NLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPDPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NLR | EPDPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.53% | 7.11% | +5.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.94% | 11.64% | +21.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.20% | 16.26% | +25.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.16% | 14.07% | +14.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.38% | 14.88% | +8.50% |