PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NLR vs. DTCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NLR vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly lower than DTCR's 47.68% return.


NLR

1D
0.84%
1M
-5.96%
YTD
-1.81%
6M
-3.70%
1Y
19.00%
3Y*
29.88%
5Y*
19.78%
10Y*
12.80%

DTCR

1D
0.23%
1M
5.06%
YTD
47.68%
6M
48.56%
1Y
76.02%
3Y*
33.82%
5Y*
14.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLR vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
-1.81%56.50%14.26%36.67%2.29%13.63%11.13%
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
47.68%28.99%14.92%18.93%-30.89%20.35%6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between NLR and DTCR is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020

0.50

The correlation between NLR and DTCR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NLR vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLR
NLR Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

DTCR
DTCR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DTCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTCR Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DTCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTCR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLR vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NLRDTCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.50

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

5.64

-5.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.41

17.40

-16.00

NLR vs. DTCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the DTCR Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLR and DTCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NLR vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -65.05%, which is greater than DTCR's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and DTCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NLRDTCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.05%

-38.98%

-26.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.72%

-12.89%

-16.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.48%

-24.96%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.48%

-38.98%

+8.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.81%

-3.92%

-21.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.70%

-12.32%

-23.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.33%

4.17%

+9.16%

Volatility

NLR vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a higher volatility of 13.73% compared to Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) at 9.32%. This indicates that NLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DTCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NLRDTCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.73%

9.32%

+4.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.75%

18.44%

+15.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.85%

22.99%

+19.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.56%

22.04%

+7.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.22%

22.06%

+2.16%

NLR vs. DTCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLR has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than DTCR's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

NLR vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison

NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than DTCR's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTCR
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF
0.74%1.10%1.72%1.18%2.57%1.27%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
2.60%2.55%0.76%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.21%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


NLR and DTCR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NLR has higher volatility (13.73%) compared to DTCR (9.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLR dropped -65.05% vs DTCR's -38.98%.

On 5-year performance, NLR leads with 19.78% vs 14.12% for DTCR. On fees, DTCR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DTCR has been the lower-risk option at 9.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NLR has performed better with a 19.78% return vs 14.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DTCR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.

NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.74% for DTCR.

NLR is categorized as Uranium, while DTCR is REIT. NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while DTCR tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NLR and 0.50% for DTCR.

DTCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NLR and DTCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer