NLR vs. AIQ

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NLR is a Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NLR returned 20.95%/yr vs 18.01%/yr for AIQ. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NLR charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.

Performance

NLR vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLR achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 30.85% return.

NLR

• 1D: 3.33%
• 1M: -2.83%
• YTD: 1.46%
• 6M: 2.10%
• 1Y: 22.97%
• 3Y*: 30.97%
• 5Y*: 20.95%
• 10Y*: 13.18%

AIQ

• 1D: 3.98%
• 1M: 9.03%
• YTD: 30.85%
• 6M: 33.54%
• 1Y: 60.30%
• 3Y*: 33.19%
• 5Y*: 18.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLR vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	1.46%	56.50%	14.26%	36.67%	2.29%	13.63%	3.49%	0.20%	1.89%
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	30.85%	31.89%	24.11%	55.39%	-36.44%	17.09%	52.88%	39.94%	-14.05%

Correlation

The correlation between NLR and AIQ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018	0.50

The correlation between NLR and AIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

NLR vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NLR	AIQ
Energy	45.3%	-
Utilities	38.1%	-
Industrials	15.1%	3.4%
Technology	1.6%	77.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	11.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	0.4%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

NLR vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLR

NLR Risk / Return Rank: 19
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 19
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 18

AIQ

AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 76
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 76
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLR vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NLR	AIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	2.37	-1.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.02	2.91	-1.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.40	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.78	3.68	-2.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.72	12.07	-10.35

NLR vs. AIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLR Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the AIQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLR and AIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NLR vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLR drawdown since its inception was -65.05%, which is greater than AIQ's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLR and AIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NLR	AIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.05%	-44.66%	-20.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.72%	-16.47%	-13.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.48%	-26.35%	-4.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.48%	-44.66%	+14.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.34%	-5.12%	-18.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.70%	-9.79%	-25.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.41%	5.01%	+8.40%

Volatility

NLR vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a higher volatility of 14.21% compared to Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) at 13.44%. This indicates that NLR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NLR	AIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.21%	13.44%	+0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.77%	21.69%	+12.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.06%	25.60%	+17.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.61%	25.80%	+3.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.25%	25.74%	-1.49%

NLR vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLR has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

NLR vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison

NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than AIQ's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF	0.14%	0.18%	0.14%	0.16%	0.56%	0.15%	0.50%	0.51%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF	2.51%	2.55%	0.76%	4.54%	2.02%	1.99%	2.23%	2.21%	3.91%	4.86%	3.62%	3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NLR and AIQ in my portfolio?

NLR and AIQ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NLR or AIQ?

NLR has higher volatility (14.21%) compared to AIQ (13.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLR dropped -65.05% vs AIQ's -44.66%.

Which ETF is better, NLR or AIQ?

On 5-year performance, NLR leads with 20.95% vs 18.01% for AIQ. On fees, NLR is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, AIQ has been the lower-risk option at 13.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NLR or AIQ?

Over the 5-year period, NLR has performed better with a 20.95% return vs 18.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NLR or AIQ?

NLR is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NLR or AIQ?

NLR has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.

What is the main difference between NLR and AIQ?

NLR is categorized as Uranium, while AIQ is Technology Equities. NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for NLR and 0.68% for AIQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.