PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NLCAX vs. XHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NLCAX vs. XHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Large-Cap Growth Fund (NLCAX) and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLCAX achieves a 6.77% return, which is significantly lower than XHR's 43.02% return. Over the past 10 years, NLCAX has outperformed XHR with an annualized return of 15.90%, while XHR has yielded a comparatively lower 5.92% annualized return.


NLCAX

1D
-0.78%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
6.77%
6M
5.38%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
22.49%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
15.90%

XHR

1D
-0.35%
1M
19.08%
YTD
43.02%
6M
40.45%
1Y
67.09%
3Y*
23.91%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
5.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLCAX vs. XHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NLCAX
Voya Large-Cap Growth Fund
6.77%14.63%34.62%37.74%-31.26%18.63%30.75%32.35%-1.91%29.29%
XHR
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
43.02%-0.71%12.72%6.71%-26.13%19.14%-27.75%32.33%-15.96%17.61%

Correlation

The correlation between NLCAX and XHR is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2015

0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between NLCAX and XHR has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NLCAX vs. XHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLCAX
NLCAX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
NLCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NLCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XHR
XHR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHR Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
XHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHR Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLCAX vs. XHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Large-Cap Growth Fund (NLCAX) and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NLCAXXHRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

4.15

-2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.57

12.33

-7.76

NLCAX vs. XHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLCAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the XHR Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLCAX and XHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NLCAX vs. XHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLCAX drawdown since its inception was -76.45%, which is greater than XHR's maximum drawdown of -71.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLCAX and XHR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NLCAXXHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.45%

-71.02%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.52%

-16.23%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.76%

-42.47%

+17.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.36%

-49.78%

+14.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.36%

-71.02%

+35.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.78%

-0.35%

-3.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.22%

-26.03%

-5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.16%

5.46%

-0.30%

Volatility

NLCAX vs. XHR - Volatility Comparison

Voya Large-Cap Growth Fund (NLCAX) and Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR) have volatilities of 6.91% and 6.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NLCAXXHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

6.74%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.87%

20.20%

-6.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.52%

27.70%

-10.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.31%

34.54%

-12.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.37%

42.49%

-21.12%

Dividends

NLCAX vs. XHR - Dividend Comparison

NLCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.14%, more than XHR's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NLCAX
Voya Large-Cap Growth Fund
15.14%16.16%4.69%0.00%24.97%18.15%13.40%4.61%7.42%5.86%5.52%7.37%
XHR
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
2.80%3.96%3.23%2.94%1.52%0.00%1.81%5.09%6.40%5.09%5.66%5.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


NLCAX and XHR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NLCAX has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to XHR (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLCAX dropped -76.45% vs XHR's -71.02%.

XHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NLCAX and XHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer