NLCAX vs. MCSFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NLCAX (Voya Large-Cap Growth Fund) and MCSFX (MFS Commodity Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - NLCAX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Voya, while MCSFX is a Commodities fund managed by MFS. Over the past 5 years, NLCAX returned 11.76%/yr vs 9.76%/yr for MCSFX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NLCAX charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for MCSFX.

Performance

NLCAX vs. MCSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Large-Cap Growth Fund (NLCAX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NLCAX achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly lower than MCSFX's 15.83% return.

NLCAX

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: 0.48%
• YTD: 7.61%
• 6M: 6.91%
• 1Y: 23.38%
• 3Y*: 22.51%
• 5Y*: 11.76%
• 10Y*: 15.69%

MCSFX

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -6.92%
• YTD: 15.83%
• 6M: 15.83%
• 1Y: 23.42%
• 3Y*: 11.48%
• 5Y*: 9.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLCAX vs. MCSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
NLCAX Voya Large-Cap Growth Fund	7.61%	14.63%	34.62%	37.74%	-31.26%	18.63%	30.75%	15.54%
MCSFX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund	15.83%	17.09%	4.32%	-7.25%	12.27%	26.40%	-1.34%	-1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NLCAX and MCSFX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2019	0.15

The correlation between NLCAX and MCSFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NLCAX vs. MCSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NLCAX

NLCAX Risk / Return Rank: 24
NLCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
NLCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
NLCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
NLCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
NLCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

MCSFX

MCSFX Risk / Return Rank: 32
MCSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
MCSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
MCSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
MCSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
MCSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NLCAX vs. MCSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Large-Cap Growth Fund (NLCAX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NLCAX	MCSFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	1.42	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	1.91	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.26	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	2.32	-0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.63	7.89	-3.26

NLCAX vs. MCSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NLCAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the MCSFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NLCAX and MCSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NLCAX vs. MCSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NLCAX drawdown since its inception was -76.45%, which is greater than MCSFX's maximum drawdown of -37.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLCAX and MCSFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NLCAX	MCSFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.45%	-37.16%	-39.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.52%	-9.74%	-7.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.76%	-9.74%	-15.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.36%	-37.16%	+1.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.02%	-9.74%	+6.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.22%	-18.20%	-13.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.16%	3.02%	+2.14%

Volatility

NLCAX vs. MCSFX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Large-Cap Growth Fund (NLCAX) has a higher volatility of 7.06% compared to MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX) at 3.51%. This indicates that NLCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NLCAX	MCSFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.06%	3.51%	+3.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.86%	13.82%	+0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.47%	15.93%	+1.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.31%	34.11%	-11.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.36%	29.49%	-8.13%

NLCAX vs. MCSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLCAX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSFX's 1.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

NLCAX vs. MCSFX - Dividend Comparison

NLCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.02%, more than MCSFX's 12.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MCSFX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund	12.99%	15.05%	2.25%	1.04%	26.24%	54.80%	0.15%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NLCAX Voya Large-Cap Growth Fund	15.02%	16.16%	4.69%	0.00%	24.97%	18.15%	13.40%	4.61%	7.42%	5.86%	5.52%	7.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NLCAX and MCSFX in my portfolio?

NLCAX and MCSFX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NLCAX or MCSFX?

NLCAX has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to MCSFX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NLCAX dropped -76.45% vs MCSFX's -37.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NLCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.