NJUL vs. FTQI
NJUL (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July) and FTQI (First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - NJUL tracks the Invesco QQQ Trust while FTQI tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NJUL returned 10.68%/yr vs 12.43%/yr for FTQI. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NJUL charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FTQI.
Performance
NJUL vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NJUL achieves a 5.44% return, which is significantly lower than FTQI's 13.57% return.
NJUL
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- 6M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 1Y
- 11.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.68%
- 10Y*
- —
FTQI
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 12.76%
- YTD
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 27.70%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.68%
NJUL vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NJUL Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July | 5.44% | 15.67% | 13.93% | 29.52% | -11.67% | 7.86% | 9.05% |
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 13.57% | 12.68% | 18.30% | 23.63% | -8.77% | 10.46% | 2.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between NJUL and FTQI is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2020 | 0.75 |
The correlation between NJUL and FTQI shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.87 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NJUL vs. FTQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NJUL
FTQI
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
NJUL
FTQI
Communication Services
NJUL
FTQI
Consumer Cyclical
NJUL
FTQI
Consumer Defensive
NJUL
FTQI
Healthcare
NJUL
FTQI
Industrials
NJUL
FTQI
Utilities
NJUL
FTQI
Basic Materials
NJUL
FTQI
Energy
NJUL
FTQI
Financial Services
NJUL
FTQI
Real Estate
NJUL
FTQI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NJUL vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank
NJUL
FTQI
NJUL vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July (NJUL) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NJUL | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.48 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 4.46 | -2.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.15 | 21.13 | -8.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NJUL vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NJUL drawdown since its inception was -14.37%, smaller than the maximum FTQI drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NJUL and FTQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NJUL | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.37% | -19.42% | +5.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.93% | -6.24% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.58% | -19.42% | +5.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.37% | -19.42% | +5.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -0.13% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -3.73% | +1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 1.31% | -0.33% |
Volatility
NJUL vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July (NJUL) is 2.42%, while First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that NJUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NJUL | FTQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 2.86% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.66% | 8.79% | -3.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.32% | 10.84% | -3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.61% | 14.82% | -3.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.00% | 12.98% | -1.98% |
NJUL vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
NJUL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NJUL vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison
NJUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF | 10.84% | 11.46% | 11.66% | 11.49% | 9.85% | 3.05% | 3.27% | 2.95% | 3.27% | 2.74% | 3.02% | 3.54% |
NJUL Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NJUL and FTQI have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTQI has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to NJUL (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NJUL dropped -14.37% vs FTQI's -19.42%.
On 5-year performance, FTQI leads with 12.43% vs 10.68% for NJUL. On fees, FTQI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NJUL has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTQI has performed better with a 12.43% return vs 10.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTQI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NJUL.
FTQI has the higher dividend yield at 10.84%, compared with 0.00% for NJUL.
NJUL tracks Invesco QQQ Trust, while FTQI tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NJUL and 0.75% for FTQI.
FTQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NJUL and FTQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer