NIXT vs. COWZ
NIXT (Research Affiliates Deletions ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - NIXT tracks the Research Affiliates Deletions Index while COWZ tracks the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NIXT returned 33.50% vs 22.23% for COWZ. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NIXT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.
Performance
NIXT vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NIXT achieves a 18.29% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 8.18% return.
NIXT
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 18.29%
- 6M
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 33.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COWZ
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 22.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- —
NIXT vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NIXT Research Affiliates Deletions ETF | 18.29% | 4.94% | 4.89% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 8.18% | 8.98% | 3.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between NIXT and COWZ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024 | 0.80 |
The correlation between NIXT and COWZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NIXT vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
NIXT
COWZ
NIXT vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NIXT | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.36 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 4.46 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 12.19 | -2.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NIXT | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 2.02 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.65 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
NIXT vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NIXT drawdown since its inception was -27.75%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIXT and COWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NIXT | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.75% | -38.63% | +10.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.71% | -5.00% | -6.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | -0.91% | -1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.96% | -4.81% | -1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 1.83% | +1.64% |
Volatility
NIXT vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.56%. This indicates that NIXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NIXT | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 2.56% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.08% | 7.12% | +6.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.24% | 11.13% | +10.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.31% | 17.63% | +5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.31% | 19.93% | +3.38% |
NIXT vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NIXT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
NIXT vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
NIXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than COWZ's 1.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.99% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
NIXT Research Affiliates Deletions ETF | 1.35% | 1.64% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NIXT and COWZ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NIXT has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to COWZ (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NIXT dropped -27.75% vs COWZ's -38.63%.
On 1-year performance, NIXT leads with 33.50% vs 22.23% for COWZ. On fees, NIXT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NIXT has performed better with a 33.50% return vs 22.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NIXT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.
COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.35% for NIXT.
NIXT tracks Research Affiliates Deletions Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Research Affiliates and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for NIXT and 0.49% for COWZ.
COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NIXT and COWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer