NITE vs. DARP

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

NITE (The Nightview Fund) and DARP (Grizzle Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NITE returned 17.44% vs 64.67% for DARP. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NITE charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for DARP.

Performance

NITE vs. DARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Nightview Fund (NITE) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NITE achieves a -1.55% return, which is significantly lower than DARP's 26.29% return.

NITE

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: -5.15%
• YTD: -1.55%
• 6M: -3.58%
• 1Y: 17.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DARP

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -1.69%
• YTD: 26.29%
• 6M: 25.20%
• 1Y: 64.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NITE vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NITE The Nightview Fund	-1.55%	22.57%	19.07%
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	26.29%	40.19%	2.33%

Correlation

The correlation between NITE and DARP is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024	0.70

The correlation between NITE and DARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

NITE vs. DARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NITE	DARP
Consumer Cyclical	33.9%	5.6%
Technology	29.8%	49.5%
Financial Services	16.3%	-
Communication Services	11.9%	17.2%
Industrials	4.1%	7.7%
Utilities	4.0%	4.6%
Healthcare	3.8%	1.4%
Basic Materials	-	3.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	8.2%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

NITE vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NITE

NITE Risk / Return Rank: 26
NITE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
NITE Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
NITE Omega Ratio Rank: 24
NITE Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
NITE Martin Ratio Rank: 28

DARP

DARP Risk / Return Rank: 86
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 79
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NITE vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Nightview Fund (NITE) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NITE	DARP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	2.63	-1.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	3.05	-1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.41	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.16	5.50	-4.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.52	19.42	-15.90

NITE vs. DARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NITE Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the DARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NITE and DARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NITE vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NITE drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, roughly equal to the maximum DARP drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NITE and DARP.

Drawdown Indicators

	NITE	DARP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.57%	-30.27%	+0.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.16%	-11.82%	-3.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.15%	-5.53%	-5.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.39%	-4.64%	-0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.97%	3.34%	+1.63%

Volatility

NITE vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Nightview Fund (NITE) is 7.51%, while Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a volatility of 10.70%. This indicates that NITE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NITE	DARP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.51%	10.70%	-3.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.86%	19.06%	-3.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.53%	24.83%	-4.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.70%	26.47%	+0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.70%	26.47%	+0.23%

NITE vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NITE has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

NITE vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison

NITE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DARP Grizzle Growth ETF	0.34%	0.43%	1.93%	0.32%
NITE The Nightview Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NITE and DARP in my portfolio?

NITE and DARP have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NITE or DARP?

DARP has higher volatility (10.70%) compared to NITE (7.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NITE dropped -29.57% vs DARP's -30.27%.

Which ETF is better, NITE or DARP?

On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 64.67% vs 17.44% for NITE. On fees, DARP is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NITE has been the lower-risk option at 7.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NITE or DARP?

Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 64.67% return vs 17.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NITE or DARP?

DARP is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for NITE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NITE or DARP?

DARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for NITE.

What is the main difference between NITE and DARP?

They also come from different issuers: Nightview and Grizzle. Their fees differ too: 1.25% for NITE and 0.75% for DARP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.