PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NIPAX vs. TSAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NIPAX vs. TSAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Conservative Portfolio (NIPAX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIPAX achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly lower than TSAIX's 10.10% return. Over the past 10 years, NIPAX has underperformed TSAIX with an annualized return of 5.68%, while TSAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.91% annualized return.


NIPAX

1D
0.18%
1M
1.01%
YTD
4.84%
6M
5.13%
1Y
14.80%
3Y*
10.91%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
5.68%

TSAIX

1D
0.29%
1M
1.45%
YTD
10.10%
6M
10.75%
1Y
25.82%
3Y*
19.28%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
11.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIPAX vs. TSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NIPAX
Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Conservative Portfolio
4.84%13.17%8.07%12.30%-15.45%7.44%10.00%14.31%-4.84%9.59%
TSAIX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund
10.10%20.04%15.46%22.72%-19.57%17.10%19.69%27.97%-11.27%22.35%

Correlation

The correlation between NIPAX and TSAIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2011

0.88

The correlation between NIPAX and TSAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NIPAX vs. TSAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIPAX
NIPAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
NIPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NIPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

TSAIX
TSAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TSAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TSAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIPAX vs. TSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Conservative Portfolio (NIPAX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NIPAXTSAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.36

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

2.53

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.00

11.07

+0.93

NIPAX vs. TSAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NIPAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the TSAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NIPAX and TSAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NIPAXTSAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.01

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.58

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.68

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.72

+0.16

Drawdowns

NIPAX vs. TSAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIPAX drawdown since its inception was -26.77%, smaller than the maximum TSAIX drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIPAX and TSAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NIPAXTSAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.77%

-34.58%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.82%

-10.28%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.56%

-17.29%

+10.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.93%

-28.28%

+8.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.93%

-34.58%

+14.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.49%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.66%

-4.91%

+2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

2.34%

-1.12%

Volatility

NIPAX vs. TSAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Conservative Portfolio (NIPAX) is 2.05%, while TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) has a volatility of 3.71%. This indicates that NIPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NIPAXTSAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

3.71%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.33%

10.27%

-4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.49%

12.93%

-6.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.71%

16.24%

-8.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.28%

17.65%

-10.37%

NIPAX vs. TSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NIPAX has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than TSAIX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NIPAX vs. TSAIX - Dividend Comparison

NIPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than TSAIX's 6.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NIPAX
Columbia Capital Allocation Moderate Conservative Portfolio
3.28%4.05%3.24%4.23%6.79%9.83%5.37%4.49%7.06%3.07%3.42%4.49%
TSAIX
TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund
6.70%7.38%2.94%1.81%9.27%11.82%5.59%5.71%5.71%1.13%4.12%7.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, NIPAX and TSAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSAIX has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to NIPAX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NIPAX dropped -26.77% vs TSAIX's -34.58%.

NIPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NIPAX and TSAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer