NINLX vs. SWSSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX).
NINLX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on May 10, 2010. SWSSX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 19, 1997.
Performance
NINLX vs. SWSSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NINLX vs. SWSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NINLX Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund | 2.49% | 18.20% | 7.62% | 13.89% | -20.22% | 26.42% | 27.14% | 24.92% | -10.56% | 16.81% |
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | 0.90% | 12.88% | 11.57% | 17.07% | -20.43% | 14.77% | 20.12% | 25.63% | -11.19% | 14.76% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NINLX achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly higher than SWSSX's 0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, NINLX has outperformed SWSSX with an annualized return of 10.79%, while SWSSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.87% annualized return.
NINLX
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -5.22%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 33.80%
- 3Y*
- 12.16%
- 5Y*
- 5.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
SWSSX
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 2.87%
- 1Y
- 25.74%
- 3Y*
- 13.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NINLX vs. SWSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NINLX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than SWSSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NINLX vs. SWSSX — Risk / Return Rank
NINLX
SWSSX
NINLX vs. SWSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) and Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NINLX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 1.11 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 1.66 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.21 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 1.81 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.15 | 6.78 | +1.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NINLX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.11 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.16 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.41 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.34 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between NINLX and SWSSX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NINLX vs. SWSSX - Dividend Comparison
NINLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than SWSSX's 1.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NINLX Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund | 4.15% | 4.25% | 0.92% | 0.25% | 3.76% | 6.40% | 1.62% | 2.85% | 14.51% | 5.19% | 1.42% | 5.22% |
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares | 1.28% | 1.29% | 1.66% | 1.49% | 1.32% | 8.88% | 2.55% | 6.12% | 10.45% | 5.22% | 4.10% | 6.92% |
Drawdowns
NINLX vs. SWSSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NINLX drawdown since its inception was -59.95%, roughly equal to the maximum SWSSX drawdown of -60.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NINLX and SWSSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NINLX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.95% | -60.34% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.46% | -13.90% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.71% | -31.93% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.43% | -41.81% | -2.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.31% | -7.91% | +1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.96% | -10.78% | +0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 3.71% | +0.07% |
Volatility
NINLX vs. SWSSX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) has a higher volatility of 8.18% compared to Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) at 7.53%. This indicates that NINLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NINLX | SWSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.18% | 7.53% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.01% | 14.53% | +1.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.22% | 23.31% | +1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.79% | 22.62% | -0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.04% | 24.05% | -1.01% |