NINLX vs. NBHIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) and Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund (NBHIX).
NINLX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on May 10, 2010. NBHIX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on Nov 2, 2006.
Performance
NINLX vs. NBHIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NINLX vs. NBHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NINLX Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund | 3.56% | 18.20% | 7.62% | 13.89% | -20.22% | 26.42% | 27.14% | 24.92% | -10.56% | 16.81% |
NBHIX Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund | 4.65% | 17.69% | 13.38% | 3.87% | -4.24% | 21.67% | 3.00% | 21.52% | -5.57% | 13.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NINLX achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly lower than NBHIX's 4.65% return. Over the past 10 years, NINLX has outperformed NBHIX with an annualized return of 10.90%, while NBHIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.54% annualized return.
NINLX
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 3.56%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- 1Y
- 32.54%
- 3Y*
- 12.55%
- 5Y*
- 5.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.90%
NBHIX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -3.97%
- YTD
- 4.65%
- 6M
- 6.09%
- 1Y
- 15.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NINLX vs. NBHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NINLX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than NBHIX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NINLX vs. NBHIX — Risk / Return Rank
NINLX
NBHIX
NINLX vs. NBHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) and Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund (NBHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NINLX | NBHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 1.15 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.98 | 1.61 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 1.56 | +0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.30 | 6.79 | +2.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NINLX | NBHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 1.15 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.70 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.65 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.53 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between NINLX and NBHIX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NINLX vs. NBHIX - Dividend Comparison
NINLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than NBHIX's 1.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NINLX Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund | 4.11% | 4.25% | 0.92% | 0.25% | 3.76% | 6.40% | 1.62% | 2.85% | 14.51% | 5.19% | 1.42% | 5.22% |
NBHIX Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund | 1.52% | 1.54% | 7.09% | 6.16% | 7.83% | 10.73% | 2.18% | 5.75% | 7.71% | 6.77% | 5.92% | 6.72% |
Drawdowns
NINLX vs. NBHIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NINLX drawdown since its inception was -59.95%, which is greater than NBHIX's maximum drawdown of -40.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NINLX and NBHIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NINLX | NBHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.95% | -40.07% | -19.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -8.72% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.71% | -17.90% | -10.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.43% | -33.97% | -10.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.34% | -5.81% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.96% | -4.94% | -5.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.80% | 2.44% | +1.36% |
Volatility
NINLX vs. NBHIX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund (NBHIX) at 4.38%. This indicates that NINLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NINLX | NBHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 4.38% | +3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.03% | 8.18% | +7.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.23% | 14.37% | +10.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 13.58% | +8.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.03% | 14.72% | +8.31% |