PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NBHIX vs. ACIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NBHIX vs. ACIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund (NBHIX) and American Century Equity Income Fund Class I (ACIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NBHIX achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly lower than ACIIX's 13.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NBHIX having a 9.35% annualized return and ACIIX not far behind at 9.16%.


NBHIX

1D
0.60%
1M
1.40%
6M
3.61%
YTD
9.03%
1Y
16.92%
3Y*
13.48%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
9.35%
ALL TIME*
8.05%

ACIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.27%
6M
9.01%
YTD
13.38%
1Y
19.83%
3Y*
11.90%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*
9.16%
ALL TIME*
7.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NBHIX vs. ACIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NBHIX
Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund
9.03%17.69%13.38%3.87%-4.24%21.67%3.00%21.52%-5.57%13.26%
ACIIX
American Century Equity Income Fund Class I
13.38%12.05%10.58%4.25%-2.96%17.16%1.19%24.50%-3.53%13.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NBHIX and ACIIX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2006

0.89

The correlation between NBHIX and ACIIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NBHIX vs. ACIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NBHIX
NBHIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
NBHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NBHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

ACIIX
ACIIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ACIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ACIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NBHIX vs. ACIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund (NBHIX) and American Century Equity Income Fund Class I (ACIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NBHIXACIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

2.87

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

9.45

-4.24

NBHIX vs. ACIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NBHIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the ACIIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NBHIX and ACIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NBHIX vs. ACIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NBHIX drawdown since its inception was -40.07%, roughly equal to the maximum ACIIX drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NBHIX and ACIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NBHIXACIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.07%

-39.16%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-6.38%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.22%

-10.15%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.90%

-13.49%

-4.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.97%

-32.76%

-1.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.87%

-0.63%

-1.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-5.22%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

1.93%

+1.03%

Volatility

NBHIX vs. ACIIX - Volatility Comparison

Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund (NBHIX) and American Century Equity Income Fund Class I (ACIIX) have volatilities of 2.78% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NBHIXACIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.92%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

6.54%

+1.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.85%

8.61%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

10.78%

+2.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.73%

13.34%

+1.39%

NBHIX vs. ACIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NBHIX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than ACIIX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

NBHIX vs. ACIIX - Dividend Comparison

NBHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than ACIIX's 9.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACIIX
American Century Equity Income Fund Class I
9.48%10.55%11.71%8.21%8.96%7.02%2.18%7.57%9.05%12.14%8.08%10.72%
NBHIX
Neuberger Berman Equity Income Fund
1.49%1.54%7.09%6.16%7.83%10.73%2.18%5.75%7.71%6.77%5.92%6.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


NBHIX and ACIIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACIIX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to NBHIX (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NBHIX dropped -40.07% vs ACIIX's -39.16%.

ACIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NBHIX and ACIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer