NINLX vs. FSOPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) and Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX).
NINLX is managed by Neuberger Berman. It was launched on May 10, 2010. FSOPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 22, 2007.
Performance
NINLX vs. FSOPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NINLX vs. FSOPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NINLX Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund | 2.49% | 18.20% | 7.62% | 13.89% | -20.22% | 26.42% | 27.14% | 24.92% | -10.56% | 16.81% |
FSOPX Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund | 4.69% | 15.81% | 15.31% | 20.38% | -17.82% | 23.39% | 17.03% | 29.92% | -8.12% | 11.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NINLX achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly lower than FSOPX's 4.69% return. Over the past 10 years, NINLX has underperformed FSOPX with an annualized return of 10.79%, while FSOPX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.92% annualized return.
NINLX
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -5.22%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 33.80%
- 3Y*
- 12.16%
- 5Y*
- 5.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
FSOPX
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- -5.19%
- YTD
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 32.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- 11.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NINLX vs. FSOPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NINLX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than FSOPX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NINLX vs. FSOPX — Risk / Return Rank
NINLX
FSOPX
NINLX vs. FSOPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) and Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NINLX | FSOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 1.48 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 2.13 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.28 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 2.35 | -0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.15 | 10.03 | -1.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NINLX | FSOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.48 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.40 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.55 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.36 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between NINLX and FSOPX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NINLX vs. FSOPX - Dividend Comparison
NINLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than FSOPX's 4.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NINLX Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund | 4.15% | 4.25% | 0.92% | 0.25% | 3.76% | 6.40% | 1.62% | 2.85% | 14.51% | 5.19% | 1.42% | 5.22% |
FSOPX Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund | 4.22% | 4.41% | 9.41% | 0.98% | 5.16% | 30.85% | 2.01% | 6.67% | 13.99% | 10.31% | 0.69% | 5.93% |
Drawdowns
NINLX vs. FSOPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NINLX drawdown since its inception was -59.95%, roughly equal to the maximum FSOPX drawdown of -61.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NINLX and FSOPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NINLX | FSOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.95% | -61.75% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.46% | -13.87% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.71% | -30.06% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.43% | -39.15% | -5.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.31% | -6.29% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.96% | -10.45% | +0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 3.25% | +0.53% |
Volatility
NINLX vs. FSOPX - Volatility Comparison
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) and Fidelity Series Small Cap Opportunities Fund (FSOPX) have volatilities of 8.18% and 8.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NINLX | FSOPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.18% | 8.00% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.01% | 13.55% | +2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.22% | 22.47% | +2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.79% | 21.70% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.04% | 21.93% | +1.11% |