NILTX vs. NML

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

NILTX (Neuberger Berman International Select Fund) and NML (Neuberger Berman MLP) are both mutual funds - NILTX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Neuberger Berman, while NML is a MLPs fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman. Over the past 10 years, NILTX returned 6.58%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for NML. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NILTX charges 1.19%/yr vs 2.72%/yr for NML.

Performance

NILTX vs. NML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman International Select Fund (NILTX) and Neuberger Berman MLP (NML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NILTX achieves a 6.50% return, which is significantly lower than NML's 22.96% return. Over the past 10 years, NILTX has underperformed NML with an annualized return of 6.58%, while NML has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.

NILTX

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 6.50%
• 6M: 4.18%
• 1Y: 4.78%
• 3Y*: 11.03%
• 5Y*: 2.60%
• 10Y*: 6.58%

NML

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 22.96%
• 6M: 20.41%
• 1Y: 27.16%
• 3Y*: 26.90%
• 5Y*: 23.73%
• 10Y*: 9.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NILTX vs. NML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NILTX Neuberger Berman International Select Fund	6.50%	16.45%	4.16%	14.28%	-25.27%	14.02%	15.00%	26.12%	-15.14%	27.25%
NML Neuberger Berman MLP	22.96%	4.36%	40.55%	14.61%	32.75%	61.76%	-45.84%	10.60%	-23.02%	7.07%

Correlation

The correlation between NILTX and NML is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2013	0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between NILTX and NML has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

NILTX vs. NML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NILTX

NILTX Risk / Return Rank: 5
NILTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
NILTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
NILTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5
NILTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
NILTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

NML

NML Risk / Return Rank: 38
NML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
NML Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
NML Omega Ratio Rank: 31
NML Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
NML Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NILTX vs. NML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman International Select Fund (NILTX) and Neuberger Berman MLP (NML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NILTX	NML	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.30	1.62	-1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.51	2.21	-1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.28	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.37	2.82	-2.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.14	8.01	-6.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NILTX vs. NML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NILTX Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the NML Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NILTX and NML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NILTX	NML	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30	1.62	-1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	1.00	-0.84
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39	0.28	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.07	+0.17

Drawdowns

NILTX vs. NML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NILTX drawdown since its inception was -58.23%, smaller than the maximum NML drawdown of -90.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NILTX and NML.

Drawdown Indicators

	NILTX	NML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.23%	-90.48%	+32.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.64%	-9.67%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.35%	-16.92%	+1.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.90%	-21.40%	-13.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.90%	-84.84%	+49.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.28%	-4.35%	+3.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.66%	-37.07%	+23.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.34%	3.40%	+0.94%

Volatility

NILTX vs. NML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman International Select Fund (NILTX) is 4.65%, while Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that NILTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NILTX	NML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	5.85%	-1.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.08%	13.20%	+0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.63%	16.79%	-0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.85%	23.90%	-7.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.05%	35.13%	-18.08%

NILTX vs. NML - Expense Ratio Comparison

NILTX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than NML's 2.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

NILTX vs. NML - Dividend Comparison

NILTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NILTX Neuberger Berman International Select Fund	0.00%	0.00%	2.96%	2.53%	0.88%	10.94%	1.11%	2.80%	1.68%	0.78%	1.15%	0.89%
NML Neuberger Berman MLP	7.16%	8.24%	7.94%	10.19%	4.26%	3.54%	8.33%	9.76%	9.87%	7.04%	8.63%	15.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NILTX and NML in my portfolio?

NILTX and NML have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NILTX or NML?

NML has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to NILTX (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NILTX dropped -58.23% vs NML's -90.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.