NIKL vs. PWRZ

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

NIKL (Sprott Nickel Miners ETF) and PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. NIKL is passively managed, while PWRZ is actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

NIKL vs. PWRZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) and TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NIKL

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -10.29%
• 6M: -30.24%
• YTD: -17.42%
• 1Y: 10.19%
• 3Y*: -9.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PWRZ

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIKL vs. PWRZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NIKL Sprott Nickel Miners ETF	1.23%
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF	-0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between NIKL and PWRZ is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026	0.31

Return for Risk

NIKL vs. PWRZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIKL

NIKL Risk / Return Rank: 14
NIKL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
NIKL Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
NIKL Omega Ratio Rank: 15
NIKL Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
NIKL Martin Ratio Rank: 14

PWRZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIKL vs. PWRZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) and TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NIKL	PWRZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.24	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.26	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.59	—	—

Drawdowns

NIKL vs. PWRZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIKL drawdown since its inception was -60.23%, which is greater than PWRZ's maximum drawdown of -1.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIKL and PWRZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NIKL	PWRZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.23%	-1.21%	-59.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.91%	-1.02%	-35.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.86%	-0.52%	-26.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.20%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NIKL	PWRZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.64%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.13%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.89%	11.53%	+31.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.96%	11.53%	+21.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.96%	11.53%	+21.43%

NIKL vs. PWRZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NIKL and PWRZ have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

NIKL vs. PWRZ - Dividend Comparison

NIKL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, while PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NIKL Sprott Nickel Miners ETF	3.06%	2.53%	3.49%	19.52%
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NIKL and PWRZ in my portfolio?

NIKL and PWRZ have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NIKL or PWRZ?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NIKL or PWRZ?

NIKL and PWRZ have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NIKL or PWRZ?

NIKL has the higher dividend yield at 3.06%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.

What is the main difference between NIKL and PWRZ?

They also come from different issuers: Sprott and TrueShares.